|
|
Post by Donald j putin on Nov 28, 2017 18:23:40 GMT -5
Backed by our Intelligence agencies and passed by Congress why hasn't this president implemented the important sanctions against Russia?
It must be part of the deal he struck with Russia when they helped him get elected through collusion.
|
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 28, 2017 19:04:05 GMT -5
How SPECIFICALLY did the Russians help get Trump elected?
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Nov 28, 2017 19:07:04 GMT -5
How SPECIFICALLY did the Russians help get Trump elected? CNN, WaPo, and MSNBC said so. |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Nov 29, 2017 8:41:09 GMT -5
How SPECIFICALLY did the Russians help get Trump elected? CNN, WaPo, and MSNBC said so. Hillary said so. And you can trust her. Right? |
|
|
|
Post by Donald J Putin on Nov 29, 2017 9:19:33 GMT -5
Give one good reason why Trump hasn't implemented the sanctions that the GOP congress told him to implement???
|
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 9:23:20 GMT -5
Give one good reason why Trump hasn't implemented the sanctions that the GOP congress told him to implement??? Because Trump is a buffoon more concerned about what people say about him? I don't know why he does or doesn't do anything. He's not done a lot of things he said he would do. That doesn't mean it's because he owes Russia anything.
Now...How SPECIFICALLY did the Russians help get Trump elected?
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Nov 29, 2017 9:50:38 GMT -5
The Village Idiot can't answer. He's spinning like a top in a panic.
The worst things that could've happened have happened and his sad little existence is in shambles.
He said:
Obstruction
Collusion
Recount
Popular vote
Electoral College
Russia Russia
Impeachment
Unfit
Economy crash
Participation rate baby boomers (funniest of all)
Debunking U-one (tic toc tic toc)
.......and on and on and on
HE IS 100% WRONG ON EVERY TOPIC, EVERY DAY, FOR EVERYTHING.
You think he can answer "how Russians helped"? LOL LOL LOL LOL!!!!!
You think the BDC Village Idiot knows that Russia has tried to interfere in every U.S. election since the 1960's? And we theirs?
They don't teach (lie about) that on MSNBC, CNN,NY Times, and Wa Po. They only do that for "Trump-hate"
We have (just revised) GDP at 3.3% after 8 years of 1.9% disaster, consumer confidence at all-time high, housing through the roof, DOW all time high, a reversed (after 8 years of the worst in history) labor participation rate, lowest UE in 10 years, a looming tax reform ready to repatriotize $4 TRILLION.....and the list goes on and on.
This is the worst nightmare a Libtard moron could have. Success for America destroys his very religion, his existence, his being. He needs hate, disaster, divisiveness, poverty, and failure to keep his "America sux" narrative going for himself and his layabout goon squad.
The BDC Village Idiot cannot answer and even if he could, he'd be WRONG like always.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donald J Putin on Nov 29, 2017 10:06:51 GMT -5
Yeah None of you can explain why Trump has not implemented the Sanctions against Russia???
You can't admit the truth that Russia colluded with Trump and he won't put sanctions on them even though GOP Congress passed them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 10:08:09 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... whacko wingnuts have their heads so far up the asses of their comrades that they simply refuse to believe their own US intel agencies. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released its most detailed report on alleged Russian hacking aimed at interfering with the presidential election on Friday.
The 25-page report states that the CIA, FBI, and NSA have concluded that Russia was behind a series of attacks, as well as disinformation disseminated via various media, with the goal of undermining faith in U.S. elections and harming Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects and her prospective administration.
www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/odni-report-on-russian-hacking/512465/
At a rare news conference, Senators Richard M. Burr, Republican of North Carolina and the committee’s chairman, and Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia and its vice chairman, broadly endorsed the conclusions of American spy agencies that said President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia directed a campaign of hacking and propaganda to disrupt the 2016 presidential election.
American intelligence agencies have concluded that Mr. Putin initially wanted to hurt Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, but later tried to explicitly help Donald J. Trump’s insurgent campaign.
www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/us/politics/senate-intelligence-committee-russia-election-trump.html
The US intelligence community concluded in a declassified report released Friday that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an "influence campaign" aimed at hurting Hillary Clinton and helping Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
The campaign -- which consisted of hacking Democratic groups and individuals, including Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, and releasing that information via third-party websites, including WikiLeaks -- amounted to what the intelligence report called "a significant escalation" in longtime Russian efforts to undermine "the US-led liberal democratic order."
www.cnn.com/2017/01/06/politics/intelligence-report-putin-election/index.html |
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:09:58 GMT -5
Yeah None of you can explain why Trump has not implemented the Sanctions against Russia??? You can't admit the truth that Russia colluded with Trump and he won't put sanctions on them even though GOP Congress passed them. Says he guy who can't explain how SPECIFICALLY the Russians helped get Trump elected
YOU are the one who claimed Russia helped get Trump elected yet you offer no explanation. Hmmmmmm
|
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:14:02 GMT -5
'The 25-page report states that the CIA, FBI, and NSA have concluded that Russia was behind a series of attacks, as well as disinformation disseminated via various media, with the goal of undermining faith in U.S. elections and harming Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects and her prospective administration.'
Great...they were behind a series of attacks...and? How specifically did these attacks help Trump win the states he needed to get the electoral votes he needed to win? Remember, Hillary had way more votes than Trump. She just didn't happen to win the key states to get the electoral votes needed.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Nov 29, 2017 10:16:58 GMT -5
There was some report recently that the FBI under Obama failed to notify anyone that the Russians were attempting to interfere in the election.
Presumably because they assumed that Clinton was going to win so they didn't want to rock the boat.
Live by politics, die by politics.
|
|
|
|
Post by Donald J Putin on Nov 29, 2017 10:17:32 GMT -5
They can't explain why Trump won't implement the sanctions because the truth is too damaging.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Nov 29, 2017 10:18:40 GMT -5
'The 25-page report states that the CIA, FBI, and NSA have concluded that Russia was behind a series of attacks, as well as disinformation disseminated via various media, with the goal of undermining faith in U.S. elections and harming Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects and her prospective administration.'Great...they were behind a series of attacks...and? How specifically did these attacks help Trump win the states he needed to get the electoral votes he needed to win? Remember, Hillary had way more votes than Trump. She just didn't happen to win the key states to get the electoral votes needed. Their aim was not to support any one candidate. Rather, their intent was to sow the seeds of uncertainty and discontent in the election. Guess who fell for it. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 10:19:58 GMT -5
WTF?
Seriously?
Are you just being laughably ignorant for laughs?
|
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:20:25 GMT -5
They can't explain why Trump won't implement the sanctions because the truth is too damaging. What truth? I'm all ears for the truth. I would love for someone to explain SPECFICALLY how Russia helped Trump get more electoral votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:22:32 GMT -5
WTF? Seriously? Are you just being laughably ignorant for laughs? So no specific details. You have no idea how Russia helped Trump win the election. Got it |
|
|
|
Post by Donald J putin on Nov 29, 2017 10:23:06 GMT -5
'The 25-page report states that the CIA, FBI, and NSA have concluded that Russia was behind a series of attacks, as well as disinformation disseminated via various media, with the goal of undermining faith in U.S. elections and harming Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects and her prospective administration.'Great...they were behind a series of attacks...and? How specifically did these attacks help Trump win the states he needed to get the electoral votes he needed to win? Remember, Hillary had way more votes than Trump. She just didn't happen to win the key states to get the electoral votes needed. Their aim was not to support any one candidate. Rather, their intent was to sow the seeds of uncertainty and discontent in the election. Guess who fell for it. Then tell Trump to implement the sanctions. There has to be a reason why he won't. The only reason can be that he doesn't want to put sanctions on Russia because they colluded with Trump. Come up with a better reason. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 10:25:03 GMT -5
'The 25-page report states that the CIA, FBI, and NSA have concluded that Russia was behind a series of attacks, as well as disinformation disseminated via various media, with the goal of undermining faith in U.S. elections and harming Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects and her prospective administration.'Great...they were behind a series of attacks...and? How specifically did these attacks help Trump win the states he needed to get the electoral votes he needed to win? Remember, Hillary had way more votes than Trump. She just didn't happen to win the key states to get the electoral votes needed. Their aim was not to support any one candidate. Rather, their intent was to sow the seeds of uncertainty and discontent in the election. Guess who fell for it. So you're saying that the Liar-in-Chief's own intel agencies are lying? These detailed reports were put out in Oct 2017, long after the Liar-in-Chief installed his own heads of these agencies ... are they now part of the 'deep state'? |
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:25:37 GMT -5
'The 25-page report states that the CIA, FBI, and NSA have concluded that Russia was behind a series of attacks, as well as disinformation disseminated via various media, with the goal of undermining faith in U.S. elections and harming Hillary Clinton’s presidential prospects and her prospective administration.'Great...they were behind a series of attacks...and? How specifically did these attacks help Trump win the states he needed to get the electoral votes he needed to win? Remember, Hillary had way more votes than Trump. She just didn't happen to win the key states to get the electoral votes needed. Their aim was not to support any one candidate. Rather, their intent was to sow the seeds of uncertainty and discontent in the election. Guess who fell for it. Again HOW did they do it. Pretty much everyone, except for the diehards on each side, felt NEITHER candidate was a good choice from the get go. We already were uncertain about both candidates...BEFORE there was any talk about Russia interference |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 10:25:45 GMT -5
They can't explain why Trump won't implement the sanctions because the truth is too damaging. What truth? I'm all ears for the truth. I would love for someone to explain SPECFICALLY how Russia helped Trump get more electoral votes.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WHAT A F#CKING MORON !!!! |
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:28:11 GMT -5
What truth? I'm all ears for the truth. I would love for someone to explain SPECFICALLY how Russia helped Trump get more electoral votes.
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA WHAT A F#CKING MORON !!!! In other words you have no answer so you post this drivel. Got it |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 10:32:29 GMT -5
WTF? Seriously? Are you just being laughably ignorant for laughs? So no specific details. You have no idea how Russia helped Trump win the election. Got it BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You really are a f()cking moron. There's a reason why the US and other large countries invest heavily in propaganda programs and spread disinformation about our enemies ... because it works ... and it worked on the ignorant buffoons who voted for the Racist-in-Chief. Your laughable ignorance and stupidity proves it so ... you will bitterly cling to your whacko wingnut ignorant ideology because that's the only thing you have. Case in point: You still say that Clinton was found guilty of perjury even though that is patently and provably false. You're a gullible buffoon. |
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:37:08 GMT -5
So no specific details. You have no idea how Russia helped Trump win the election. Got it BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You really are a f()cking moron. There's a reason why the US and other large countries invest heavily in propaganda programs and spread disinformation about our enemies ... because it works ... and it worked on the ignorant buffoons who voted for the Racist-in-Chief. Your laughable ignorance and stupidity proves it so ... you will bitterly cling to your whacko wingnut ignorant ideology because that's the only thing you have. Again, Hillary got more votes. She just didn't win the key states needed for electoral votes. Neither candidate was a great option. To say it was because of Russia that Trump won is silly. There was plenty of dirt on BOTH candidates. We didn't need anyone else to make us aware of that. We all knew all about both candidates....warts and all. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 10:43:09 GMT -5
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You really are a f()cking moron. There's a reason why the US and other large countries invest heavily in propaganda programs and spread disinformation about our enemies ... because it works ... and it worked on the ignorant buffoons who voted for the Racist-in-Chief. Your laughable ignorance and stupidity proves it so ... you will bitterly cling to your whacko wingnut ignorant ideology because that's the only thing you have. Again, Hillary got more votes. She just didn't win the key states needed for electoral votes. Neither candidate was a great option. To say it was because of Russia that Trump won is silly. There was plenty of dirt on BOTH candidates. We didn't need anyone else to make us aware of that. We all knew all about both candidates....warts and all. Hey dipstick ... no one is saying that it was the only factor ... the intel agencies are saying that Russia made a concerted effort to undermine HRC and elevate the Angry Cheeto ... and they outlined the various methods they used. How much it worked may be unquantifiable ... but the effects of disinformation and propaganda is real and on full display every time some Trumpista quotes some patently false narrative they read on Facebook or Twitter or any number of wingnut echo chamber websites. The Racist-in-Chief leads a cult-of-personality and his followers will believe anything that elevates him and hurts his opponents. |
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:53:07 GMT -5
Again, Hillary got more votes. She just didn't win the key states needed for electoral votes. Neither candidate was a great option. To say it was because of Russia that Trump won is silly. There was plenty of dirt on BOTH candidates. We didn't need anyone else to make us aware of that. We all knew all about both candidates....warts and all. Hey dipstick ... no one is saying that it was the only factor ... the intel agencies are saying that Russia made a concerted effort to undermine HRC and elevate the Angry Cheeto ... and they outlined the various methods they used. How much it worked may be unquantifiable ... but the effects of disinformation and propaganda is real and on full display every time some Trumpista quotes some patently false narrative they read on Facebook or Twitter or any number of wingnut echo chamber websites. The Racist-in-Chief leads a cult-of-personality and his followers will believe anything that elevates him and hurts his opponents. How much it worked is may be unquantifiable. Especially since you can't even give examples of how Russia caused people to vote for Trump.
'Russia making a concerted effort', doesn't mean it worked. You have no proof of anyone who voted for Trump because of 'Russia making a concerted effort to undermine HRC'. No one needed to make any effort to undermine HRC...she did that all by herself with her history. Just like Trump didn't need any help undermining himself....he did a good job of that all his own...which is why Hillary got millions more votes. If she had done a better job campaigning in certain states she'd be president.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 10:54:19 GMT -5
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You really are a f()cking moron. There's a reason why the US and other large countries invest heavily in propaganda programs and spread disinformation about our enemies ... because it works ... and it worked on the ignorant buffoons who voted for the Racist-in-Chief. Your laughable ignorance and stupidity proves it so ... you will bitterly cling to your whacko wingnut ignorant ideology because that's the only thing you have. Again, Hillary got more votes. She just didn't win the key states needed for electoral votes. Neither candidate was a great option. To say it was because of Russia that Trump won is silly. There was plenty of dirt on BOTH candidates. We didn't need anyone else to make us aware of that. We all knew all about both candidates....warts and all. And there's this: A number of Russian-linked Facebook ads specifically targeted Michigan and Wisconsin, two states crucial to Donald Trump's victory last November, according to four sources with direct knowledge of the situation.
Some of the Russian ads appeared highly sophisticated in their targeting of key demographic groups in areas of the states that turned out to be pivotal, two of the sources said. The ads employed a series of divisive messages aimed at breaking through the clutter of campaign ads online, including promoting anti-Muslim messages, sources said.
It has been unclear until now exactly which regions of the country were targeted by the ads. And while one source said that a large number of ads appeared in areas of the country that were not heavily contested in the elections, some clearly were geared at swaying public opinion in the most heavily contested battlegrounds.
www.cnn.com/2017/10/03/politics/russian-facebook-ads-michigan-wisconsin/index.html |
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 10:59:30 GMT -5
Again, Hillary got more votes. She just didn't win the key states needed for electoral votes. Neither candidate was a great option. To say it was because of Russia that Trump won is silly. There was plenty of dirt on BOTH candidates. We didn't need anyone else to make us aware of that. We all knew all about both candidates....warts and all. And there's this: A number of Russian-linked Facebook ads specifically targeted Michigan and Wisconsin, two states crucial to Donald Trump's victory last November, according to four sources with direct knowledge of the situation.
Some of the Russian ads appeared highly sophisticated in their targeting of key demographic groups in areas of the states that turned out to be pivotal, two of the sources said. The ads employed a series of divisive messages aimed at breaking through the clutter of campaign ads online, including promoting anti-Muslim messages, sources said.
It has been unclear until now exactly which regions of the country were targeted by the ads. And while one source said that a large number of ads appeared in areas of the country that were not heavily contested in the elections, some clearly were geared at swaying public opinion in the most heavily contested battlegrounds.
www.cnn.com/2017/10/03/politics/russian-facebook-ads-michigan-wisconsin/index.htmlBut again, there is no proof that people changed their vote from Hillary to Trump because of an add. No one who would support Hillary would suddenly support Trump and vice versa. What could people learn about Hillary that we didn't already know? How many negative ads about Hillary did you see on TV? I know I saw many. Did you change your vote as a result? I bet not
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2017 11:02:50 GMT -5
Hey dipstick ... no one is saying that it was the only factor ... the intel agencies are saying that Russia made a concerted effort to undermine HRC and elevate the Angry Cheeto ... and they outlined the various methods they used. How much it worked may be unquantifiable ... but the effects of disinformation and propaganda is real and on full display every time some Trumpista quotes some patently false narrative they read on Facebook or Twitter or any number of wingnut echo chamber websites. The Racist-in-Chief leads a cult-of-personality and his followers will believe anything that elevates him and hurts his opponents. How much it worked is may be unquantifiable. Especially since you can't even give examples of how Russia caused people to vote for Trump.
'Russia making a concerted effort', doesn't mean it worked. You have no proof of anyone who voted for Trump because of 'Russia making a concerted effort to undermine HRC'. No one needed to make any effort to undermine HRC...she did that all by herself with her history. Just like Trump didn't need any help undermining himself....he did a good job of that all his own...which is why Hillary got millions more votes. If she had done a better job campaigning in certain states she'd be president.
Oh geez ... now you're just being willfully ignorant ... again. Propaganda works ... it's a proven tool that sophisticated countries use to undermine their adversaries. Russia employed such tools to influence the election. The evidence it worked can been seen every time some wingnut idiot quotes the misinformation and propaganda in support of the Cheeto or against HRC. Pizzagate is a perfect example ... StalkingButtkisser keeps pushing that completely debunked conspiracy theory aimed to undermine HRC and the Dems ... the Seth Rich conspiracy is another example of the Buttkisser falling for disinformation and propaganda ... and he won't be pushed off it no matter how much facts and evidence is presented. It's laughable that you would discount this power of persuasion when you keep insisting that Clinton was found guilty of perjury when that is patently and provably false ... but you continue to believe it despite all the evidence to the contrary. |
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Nov 29, 2017 11:04:02 GMT -5
How much it worked is may be unquantifiable. Especially since you can't even give examples of how Russia caused people to vote for Trump.
'Russia making a concerted effort', doesn't mean it worked. You have no proof of anyone who voted for Trump because of 'Russia making a concerted effort to undermine HRC'. No one needed to make any effort to undermine HRC...she did that all by herself with her history. Just like Trump didn't need any help undermining himself....he did a good job of that all his own...which is why Hillary got millions more votes. If she had done a better job campaigning in certain states she'd be president.
Oh geez ... now you're just being willfully ignorant ... again. Propaganda works ... it's a proven tool that sophisticated countries use to undermine their adversaries. Russia employed such tools to influence the election. The evidence it worked can been seen every time some wingnut idiot quotes the misinformation and propaganda in support of the Cheeto or against HRC. Pizzagate is a perfect example ... StalkingButtkisser keeps pushing that completely debunked conspiracy theory aimed to undermine HRC and the Dems ... the Seth Rich conspiracy is another example of the Buttkisser falling for disinformation and propaganda ... and he won't be pushed off it no matter how much facts and evidence is presented. It's laughable that you would discount this power of persuasion when you keep insisting that Clinton was found guilty of perjury when that is patently and provably false ... but you continue to believe it despite all the evidence to the contrary. How many negative ads about Hillary did you see on TV and social media? I know I saw many. Did you change your vote as a result? I bet not |
|
