Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 4, 2017 21:37:38 GMT -5
"Angry Cheeto"?
Does that mean we are free to go as low as possible and resort to cheap ass insults (cuz in your case you have no facts and have to resort to insults)?
Does this mean I can call Obama the big-ear Curious George looking ugly f....k that he's always been with a linebacker man-wife?
Seriously? Is that all you got?
The next 4-8 years are going to suck for you especially since the "Angry Cheeto" has done more for America in 2 weeks than Curious George did in 8 years.
LOL LOL LOL
You stupid addict.
Obama's policies worked........LOL LOL LOL what a f....king tool Pfffft ... your constant name calling of Obama doesn't bother me, you've used worst in the past. What is hilarious is the little-loser-without-a-real-job getting his panties in a bunch over the apt Angry Cheeto moniker. There, there little boy ... pull down you shortpants, your delicate sensibilities are showing again. The Angry Cheeto is off to a rousing start ... he's been in office all of two weeks and already Iran is embarrassing him and doing whatever they want ... and the Angry Cheeto's response is more angry tweets. Yeah ... that'll teach 'em. Pathetic. Now Iran is just taunting the Angry Cheeto ... Feb 4, 2017 Iran does appears to not be taking Trump's escalating threats too seriously, because just one day after the US imposed restrictions on 25 Iranian individuals and entities in response to a ballistic missile test last week (a move which provoked Tehran to answer by saying it would disclose the names of US individuals and companies involved in "helping and founding" terrorist groups), Iran carried out more missile tests during a military exercise on Saturday.
www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-04/iran-defies-trump-carries-out-more-missile-tests-threatens-enemies-roaring-missiles
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 5, 2017 7:49:09 GMT -5
Awesome. Do it. Drain the swamp.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 5, 2017 7:57:36 GMT -5
Now might be a good time to note that Iran had been taunting President Obama for his entire time in office. The difference, of course, being that it made me pissed off at Iran.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 5, 2017 8:26:07 GMT -5
And now you are ticked off at Trump? The man has been ticking off a whole lot of people and groups in a very short time. Maybe record time. And that is putting it mildly. As long as he continues to tick of the right people I say keep ticking! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2017 10:30:08 GMT -5
Now might be a good time to note that Iran had been taunting President Obama for his entire time in office. The difference, of course, being that it made me pissed off at Iran. And yet Obama was able to form a coalition of the world superpowers to force Iran into abandoning it's nuclear weapons program and allow IAEA inspections of all it's nuclear facilities. The Angery Cheeto just keeps angry-tweeting ... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2017 10:55:36 GMT -5
And now you are ticked off at Trump? The man has been ticking off a whole lot of people and groups in a very short time. Maybe record time. And that is putting it mildly. As long as he continues to tick of the right people I say keep ticking! Heh, heh, heh ... yeah, ticking off our long-standing allies while kissing Putin's ass is the new wingnut foreign policy ... and wingnuts dutifully fall in line and have developed a " feeling of deep admiration" for our former " number one geo-political foe". |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2017 10:58:00 GMT -5
Awesome. Do it. Drain the swamp. So why would you believe Iran has such info and that it would be truthful? |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 5, 2017 15:37:48 GMT -5
I think that Iran would be very well aware of who is funding whom in the middle east. That you're asking me if we can trust them is more than a little ironic.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2017 14:22:52 GMT -5
I think that Iran would be very well aware of who is funding whom in the middle east. That you're asking me if we can trust them is more than a little ironic. I think that Iran may be aware of who is funding whom ... only with respect to those groups with which they have a working relationship. The only irony is that you unequivocally trust Iran to be truthful purely for political reasons ... whereas I have no such trust of Iran ... but I do trust the broad coalition of world leaders, who all have a stake in nuclear non-proliferation, to act in their best interest and on behalf of their citizens ... and that the verification process is robust and being implemented by broad spectrum of expert, independent inspectors. |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 6, 2017 15:29:26 GMT -5
I think that Iran would be very well aware of who is funding whom in the middle east. That you're asking me if we can trust them is more than a little ironic. I think that Iran may be aware of who is funding whom ... only with respect to those groups with which they have a working relationship. The only irony is that you unequivocally trust Iran to be truthful purely for political reasons ... whereas I have no such trust of Iran ... but I do trust the broad coalition of world leaders, who all have a stake in nuclear non-proliferation, to act in their best interest and on behalf of their citizens ... and that the verification process is robust and being implemented by broad spectrum of expert, independent inspectors. You probably say that to all the rogue nuclear wannabe nations. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2017 16:02:21 GMT -5
I think that Iran may be aware of who is funding whom ... only with respect to those groups with which they have a working relationship. The only irony is that you unequivocally trust Iran to be truthful purely for political reasons ... whereas I have no such trust of Iran ... but I do trust the broad coalition of world leaders, who all have a stake in nuclear non-proliferation, to act in their best interest and on behalf of their citizens ... and that the verification process is robust and being implemented by broad spectrum of expert, independent inspectors. You probably say that to all the rogue nuclear wannabe nations. Heh, heh, heh ... Facts and commonsense are just so dang hard on wingnuts. But hey ... It's not like I should expect a logical debate ... lobbing non sequiturs while running away is as good as it gets from wingnuts ... well that, and outright lying ... ain't that right, spanky? Oh sorry ... now a days you wingnuts prefer the term 'alternative facts', as opposed to 'lies'. " Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt. |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 7, 2017 9:11:02 GMT -5
"Iran Says Shipment Will Boost Its Supply of Uranium"
abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/iran-shipment-boost-supply-uranium-45284944
"Iran's nuclear chief says it will have 60 percent more stockpiled uranium than it did prior to the landmark 2015 agreement with world powers after a shipment expected later this week.
Ali Akbar Salehi was quoted by the semi-official Fars news agency on Sunday as saying that Iran will receive a final batch of 149 tons of natural uranium by Tuesday, in addition to 210 tons already delivered since early 2016.
Under the nuclear accord, Iran's import of uranium is supervised by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Low-enriched uranium can be used for civilian applications, including power generation and medical research. Highly enriched uranium can be used in nuclear weapons."
"Iran: Uranium shipment will give us 60% more than pre-deal"
www.timesofisrael.com/iran-uranium-shipment-will-give-us-60-more-than-pre-deal/
Move along......nothing to see here. The Iran Ayatollahs said "it's simply to heat our houses and cook our food"
Again, Thank you Barack
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 9:20:30 GMT -5
You're correct ... nothing to see here ... just more chickenlittle wingnuts scaring themselves half to death over something that they are wholly ignorant of.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 7, 2017 9:24:39 GMT -5
You're correct ... nothing to see here ... just more chickenlittle wingnuts scaring themselves half to death over something that they are wholly ignorant of. LOL!
Yes, you and pink-vag-hats keep your focus (obsession) on Putin, (where'd that evil "Russian hacking narrative go?) while the largest terrorist nation on earth gathers their uranium. That's a good strategy.
Fits right in with everything else that Obama touched and destroyed over the last 8 years.
"Bush's fault"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 9:29:01 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... thanks for showing off your abject ignorance ... it's as if you want to prove me right.
Carry on spanky ... you're doing a bang-up job.
I can't wait for the Angry Cheeto's mean-tweet on this ... that'll show em.
And by-the-by, spanky ... did you notice who gave Iran the uranium?
None other than the Angry Cheeto's puppetmaster ... Putin.
Do ya think we'll hear the Angry Cheeto going on a tweet tirade condemning his taskmaster for giving Iran so much uranium?
Yeah ... me neither ... puppets, by definition, just don't have it in them to contradict their masters.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 7, 2017 9:47:14 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... thanks for showing off your abject ignorance ... it's as if you want to prove me right. Carry on spanky ... you're doing a bang-up job. I can't wait for the Angry Cheeto's mean-tweet on this ... that'll show em. And by-the-by, spanky ... did you notice who gave Iran the uranium? None other than the Angry Cheeto's puppetmaster ... Putin. Do ya think we'll hear the Angry Cheeto condemning his taskmaster for giving Iran so much uranium? Yeah ... me neither ... puppets, by definition, just don't have it in them to contradict their masters. God you're dumb and naïve.
"In negotiating the secret Iran deal, President Barack Obama took the position that it wasn’t a treaty and therefore didn’t require Senate ratification under the Constitution. Had it been a treaty, Obama would’ve needed two-thirds of the upper chamber’s votes — which he wouldn’t have gotten."
nypost.com/2017/02/06/hey-team-trump-tell-america-whats-in-the-iran-deal/
Check Obama and Hellary for the gift of that uranium.
But I know I know.......it's Trump love with Putin.
Again......God you're dumb.
'Prove you right'.............LOL!!!!!
"But what was in the treaty? Ah, that was the great thing. No one knew. And now the Iranians are telling us that Obama secretly promised them they could build ballistic missiles capable of a 2,000-mile flight."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 9:53:41 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... now you're just contradicting yourself ... again ... by posting blurbs which blame the wingnut senators for approving the nuke treaty with Iran.
The past first. Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) congratulated the White House on the sanctions, which was a little hypocritical since he was one of the people who caused the problem in the first place.
Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) flipped the procedure around with a motion to condemn the treaty, which would've required a two-thirds vote to override a presidential veto. That wasn't going to happen, so Obama got his treaty.
Yeah, yeah ... I know ... The facts mentioned in your source that "The huge shipment of natural uranium from Russia ..." is really code for 'It's Obama's fault'.
And why didn't the Angry Cheeto stop this shipment with one of his presidential decrees? It's obvious he thinks he can alter every other treaty the US is party to, so why didn't this one make his twitter to-do list?
Geepers spanky ... take a knee ... you're pummeling yourself about your own head and shoulders with your own posts ... have some self-respect.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 7, 2017 10:25:53 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... now you're just contradicting yourself ... again ... by posting blurbs which blame the wingnut senators for approving the nuke treaty with Iran.
The past first. Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) congratulated the White House on the sanctions, which was a little hypocritical since he was one of the people who caused the problem in the first place.
Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) flipped the procedure around with a motion to condemn the treaty, which would've required a two-thirds vote to override a presidential veto. That wasn't going to happen, so Obama got his treaty.Yeah, yeah ... I know ... The facts mentioned in your source that " The huge shipment of natural uranium from Russia ..." is really code for 'It's Obama's fault'. And why didn't the Angry Cheeto stop this shipment with one of his presidential decrees? It's obvious he thinks he can alter every other treaty the US is party to, so why didn't this one make his twitter to-do list? Geepers spanky ... take a knee ... you're pummeling yourself about your own head and shoulders with your own posts ... have some self-respect. Wow! You're kidding right? ONE Senator? Wow! One whole Senator?
What a f....cing drunk you are.
We all love when you say "take a knee" because it always means you 've got completely pummeled about the head and neck and proven to be the clueless ideologue that you are. Only an INSANE person would believe Obama/Clinton/Kerry's "SECRET" deal with the worst country on earth. The single largest TERRORIST nation on earth. The country where daily the people chant in the streets: "Death to America"
How could a new president stop this incompetent nit-wit from doing this you dope:
"Obama's Final Gift: Uranium Headed To Iran"
www.dailywire.com/news/12249/obamas-final-gift-uranium-headed-iran-hank-berrien
"Obama approved giving Iran 116 metric tons of uranium as a ‘thank you’ gift"
www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01/10/obama-approved-giving-iran-116-metric-tons-of-uranium-as-a-thank-you-gift/
"With Obama’s Approval, Russia Selling 130 Tons of Uranium to Iran"
www.breakingisraelnews.com/81776/obamas-approval-russia-selling-130-tons-uranium-iran/#r8xTfS6UcMblfZ2K.97
Obama's SECRET DEAL!!! How can anyone with a brain defend that?
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 7, 2017 10:30:26 GMT -5
Corker is part of the swamp that needs to be drained. F.Y.I.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 10:34:06 GMT -5
And yet the Angry Cheeto put Iran "On notice" nearly a week ago ... and then stood by while Russia shipped tons of uranium to the terrorist country.
Apparently being put 'on notice' means the Angry Cheeto is gonna notice ... but he ain't gonna do squat ... which is why Iran is just taunting and laughing at him.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 7, 2017 10:37:24 GMT -5
And yet the Angry Cheeto put Iran "On notice" nearly a week ago ... and then stood by while Russia shipped tons of uranium to the terrorist country. Apparently being put 'on notice' means the Angry Cheeto is gonna notice ... but he ain't gonna do squat ... which is why Iran is just taunting and laughing at him. Were you looking for Trump to go "all cowboy" on Iran?
WWBOD?
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 7, 2017 10:39:19 GMT -5
Corker is part of the swamp that needs to be drained. F.Y.I. McCain, Graham, Collins, Warren, Pelosi, Rubio, McConnell............
BTW, McCain, Graham, Rubio, and Jeb Bush all took Soros money.
Drain the swamp.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 7, 2017 11:00:31 GMT -5
And all took Soros money. Drain the swamp.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 7, 2017 11:07:05 GMT -5
And all took Soros money. Drain the swamp. Seems some don't get "drain the swamp" do they? I don't care (and nobody should) if D or R, drain out the weasels. Graham, McConnell, McCain, etc. are all against Trump and walking a fine line because they don't want their gravy train to end. There's no party difference. They're all dirtballs |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 7, 2017 11:23:31 GMT -5
And all took Soros money. Drain the swamp. Seems some don't get "drain the swamp" do they? I don't care (and nobody should) if D or R, drain out the weasels. Graham, McConnell, McCain, etc. are all against Trump and walking a fine line because they don't want their gravy train to end. There's no party difference. They're all dirtballs The game is changing. Lots of people are still stuck in the R vs D paradigm when the real fight is the establishment deep state vs us. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 13:28:42 GMT -5
And yet the Angry Cheeto put Iran "On notice" nearly a week ago ... and then stood by while Russia shipped tons of uranium to the terrorist country. Apparently being put 'on notice' means the Angry Cheeto is gonna notice ... but he ain't gonna do squat ... which is why Iran is just taunting and laughing at him. Were you looking for Trump to go "all cowboy" on Iran?
WWBOD?
It would seem that if the Angry Cheeto and his minions really believe that the Iran nuke treaty was a disaster and that such shipments would serve to hasten their development of a nuclear bomb to a country that is an existential threat to the entire world then an effort would be made to make that not happen ... like say a phone call to his buddy Putin to try stop or just delay the uranium for some period of time. The Angry Cheeto has no problem upending the daily lives of legal residents of the US in their travels ... but delaying a shipment of uranium to terrorist country is too much of a bother. |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 7, 2017 13:45:49 GMT -5
The administration had quickly removed restrictions on green card holders being mistakenly delayed. Fake news alert!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 13:50:20 GMT -5
The administration had quickly removed restrictions on green card holders being mistakenly delayed. Fake news alert! So if it happened and people were affected ... but it was later rescinded ... it's the same as if it never happened at all. BWAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA I apologize for my guffawing ... this whacko wingnut world of 'alternative facts' takes some getting used to ... it's quite amusing. |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 7, 2017 14:24:01 GMT -5
No worries, you're a good guffawer.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2017 16:55:12 GMT -5
And all took Soros money. Drain the swamp. Heh, heh, heh ... oh the freaking hypocrisy of the whacko wingnuts ... apparently that "money = free speech" argument only works one way. Another trip down the wingnut rabbithole of 'alternative facts'. Idiots !! |
|
