|
|
Post by thebabestrikesback on Feb 1, 2017 13:39:26 GMT -5
Please point out where I have jumped to conclusions in the past......... But at least you have admitted that you were jumping to conclusions......... That thread on corporate taxes where you kept regurgitating whacko wingnut talking points stating unequivocally that lowering corp tax to 15% would save the majority of companies in the country money. Then I showed how ignorant you were because 70% of companies are pass-through entities and don't pay income taxes on profits ... then both you and SB ran away after getting slapped by facts that disproved your ideological ignorance. Or that Clinton was guilty of all sorts of crimes yet after decades of witchhunts by you whacko wingnuts not a single charge was ever brought ... and you idiots still 'know' she's guilty. LOL, I wouldn't consider the debate on taxes to be "jumping to conclusions". And it was pretty evident from Comey's statements that she was guilty. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2017 13:46:06 GMT -5
That thread on corporate taxes where you kept regurgitating whacko wingnut talking points stating unequivocally that lowering corp tax to 15% would save the majority of companies in the country money. Then I showed how ignorant you were because 70% of companies are pass-through entities and don't pay income taxes on profits ... then both you and SB ran away after getting slapped by facts that disproved your ideological ignorance. Or that Clinton was guilty of all sorts of crimes yet after decades of witchhunts by you whacko wingnuts not a single charge was ever brought ... and you idiots still 'know' she's guilty. LOL, I wouldn't consider the debate on taxes to be "jumping to conclusions". And it was pretty evident from Comey's statements that she was guilty. Oh geez ... spouting ideology without first checking whether it's true or not is the very definition of 'jumping to conclusions' ... or just proof you're a drone wingnut who swallows echo chamber bullshit on sight. And there you go again ... jumping off and convicting someone without so much as any charges being filed. Thanks for proving my point, spanky. |
|
|
|
Post by thebabestrikesback on Feb 1, 2017 13:55:03 GMT -5
LOL, I wouldn't consider the debate on taxes to be "jumping to conclusions". And it was pretty evident from Comey's statements that she was guilty. Oh geez ... spouting ideology without first checking whether it's true or not is the very definition of 'jumping to conclusions' ... or just proof you're a drone wingnut who swallows echo chamber bullshit on sight. And there you go again ... jumping off and convicting someone without so much as any charges being filed. Thanks for proving my point, spanky. Hardly proving your point. I stand by believing that cutting the corporate tax rate will have an impact on major companies, not on the LLC's and such. And I can believe she's guilty with the facts that were laid out. Just because charges were not filed doesn't change that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2017 14:04:15 GMT -5
Oh geez ... spouting ideology without first checking whether it's true or not is the very definition of 'jumping to conclusions' ... or just proof you're a drone wingnut who swallows echo chamber bullshit on sight. And there you go again ... jumping off and convicting someone without so much as any charges being filed. Thanks for proving my point, spanky. Hardly proving your point. I stand by believing that cutting the corporate tax rate will have an impact on major companies, not on the LLC's and such. And I can believe she's guilty with the facts that were laid out. Just because charges were not filed doesn't change that. First of all you said ALL corporations would see a benefit ... mentioning something about small business being the driving force behind creating jobs ... yada ... yada ... yada ... all of which was straight wingnut talking points and complete bullshit ... but that didn't stop you from jumping to the conclusion it was true ... and less than 1% of corporations pay the nominal tax ... and not one of the fortune 500 companies do. You can believe anything you want but doing so without any actual facts to back it up is just more of you being a wingnut and relying on your feelings rather on reality. Again, thanks for proving my point. |
|
|
|
Post by thebabestrikesback on Feb 1, 2017 14:09:45 GMT -5
First of all you said ALL corporations would see a benefit ... mentioning something about small business being the driving force behind creating jobs ... yada ... yada ... yada ... all of which was straight wingnut talking points and complete bullshit ... but that didn't stop you from jumping to the conclusion it was true ... and less than 1% of corporations pay the nominal tax ... and not one of the fortune 500 companies do. You can believe anything you want but doing so without any actual facts to back it up is just more of you being a wingnut and relying on your feelings rather on reality. Again, thanks for proving my point. Hardly, but keep telling yourself that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2017 14:15:40 GMT -5
First of all you said ALL corporations would see a benefit ... mentioning something about small business being the driving force behind creating jobs ... yada ... yada ... yada ... all of which was straight wingnut talking points and complete bullshit ... but that didn't stop you from jumping to the conclusion it was true ... and less than 1% of corporations pay the nominal tax ... and not one of the fortune 500 companies do. You can believe anything you want but doing so without any actual facts to back it up is just more of you being a wingnut and relying on your feelings rather on reality. Again, thanks for proving my point. Hardly, but keep telling yourself that. Are you denying my description of your argument? Are you pulling an andie and selectively remembering shit. Ya, but it's different when you hypocritical asshats do it ... am I right, spanky? |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 1, 2017 20:27:32 GMT -5
How would you know? You've never paid a tax in your life. Neither has your welfare-mama.
In your drunken mind, one meeting means it's over right. It's so cute how you think there will be no more discussion and some Mexican corrupt dope out negotiated our president (in your fantasy) That trade deficit of up to $80 Bil is just fine with you, right?
Why wouldn't it be? It has no effect on someone that gets everything free. It's actually a good thing that you've spent your life on the welfare gravy train, getting your freebies from Uncle Sugar. Imagine if you were out in the world and had to negotiate something/anything? You'd be like Tommy-Boy in that "I said no.....Okee-Dokee" scene.
Mexico will be paying for the wall and freeloaders like you will never know, care, or be affected. That's what a real president, a real negotiator does.
Awww ... look at the little racist POS ... too freaking stupid to actually make up your own insults, you have to retread mine. Just another example of what a f()cking imbecile you are. See how a negotiation works you dummy?
apnews.com/0b3f5db59b2e4aa78cdbbf008f27fb49
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump threatened in a phone call with his Mexican counterpart to send U.S. troops to stop "bad hombres down there" unless the Mexican military does more to control them, according to an excerpt of a transcript of the conversation obtained by The Associated Press.
Watching you squirm and eat your words, having to admit your stupidity, will be a gas.
You'll try and lie your way out of it.
Either way, a real president is making sure the fun is just starting.
Who's paying for that wall? LOL!
|
|
