|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Jan 10, 2017 14:57:31 GMT -5
link: The Clinton Foundation Stories
I found this series of articles on medium.com recently and thought it would be good for posting here. The author (neither Republican nor conservative FYI) has done a very thorough job investigating the Clinton Foundation and it's activities.
Excerpt:
I began researching the Clinton Foundation in May, 2016. The first of a series of articles, most written prior to detailed revelations found in Wikileaks’ Podesta emails, was published in July, 2016.
This article links to all of them with a brief description. It tells a story in and of itself, I realize. The Foundation is a perfect “fit” with some of the news reporters and pundits we’ve learned about since Bernie Sanders ran for President and so many ugly truths came out of Wikileaks. A lot of information in the articles is highly incriminating to the Clinton Foundation — because they do few “charitable” activities of public benefit and receive and spend large sums of money on salaries, travel and huge celebrity-studded galas. They are at-best, careless in their adherence to normal organizational rules, charitable law, and quaint ideas like contract deliverables and measurable outcomes.
At first, I was frightened to write anything about the Foundation, even though I was shocked by what I was seeing — gross incompetence was the most positive explanation for the extreme inconsistencies in their financial reports and public information. It was obvious the nonprofit community wasn’t commenting on the Foundation’s suspicious business model and dubious outcomes because some were completely uncritical Clinton boosters, and others feared retribution or losing money from large private foundations, the numerous big companies that donated to Clinton Foundation, or federal or state government agencies.
But I kept going. One of the best moments of the series occurred when the Wikileaks Podesta emails were published and each successive group provided new confirmation that what I’d determined independently was true — and then some.
Read the whole thing. This and the rest of her articles on Medium.com are well worth your time.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 10, 2017 17:37:59 GMT -5
So, because Trump won, a career criminal and her serial-sex criminal husband should walk away? The Clinton Foundation with $2 BILLION should be their personal ATM? The treason and obstruction of justice committed by Hellary should just be ignored?
Do you use your head for anything but donning a backwards baseball cap?
And.......who's defending Trump? Why do you keep suggesting that?
Trump is doing great and he's not even President yet.
WTF is wrong with you?
|
|
|
|
Post by thebabestrikesback on Jan 10, 2017 18:21:40 GMT -5
So, you "won". Trump is to be the next president. Clinton is no longer an issue. So how, exactly, do you go about defending Trump without mentioning Hillary Clinton? That's funny, I didn't see SB defending Trump at all. In fact Trump wasn't even mentioned, this thread is strictly about the clinton corruption. |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 10, 2017 19:06:28 GMT -5
So, because Trump won, a career criminal and her serial-sex criminal husband should walk away? The Clinton Foundation with $2 BILLION should be their personal ATM? The treason and obstruction of justice committed by Hellary should just be ignored?
Do you use your head for anything but donning a backwards baseball cap?
And.......who's defending Trump? Why do you keep suggesting that?
Trump is doing great and he's not even President yet.
WTF is wrong with you?
You said, "And.......who's defending Trump? Why do you keep suggesting that? Trump is doing great and he's not even President yet." That pretty much sums up you defending Trump. Let me repeat that for you, since you actually said it...... and I quote..... "And.......who's defending Trump? Why do you keep suggesting that? Trump is doing great and he's not even President yet." Do you not understand that in those three sentences, posted by you, that you claim to be be not supporting Trump, then asking why I think you're supporting Trump, but then supporting Trump in the end? Could you possibly articulate why you evidently think Trump is suited to be the next POTUS without making reference to Hillary Clinton? You are a total troll. 'Trump is doing great and he's not even President yet."
That pretty much sums up you defending Trump'
You are one screwed up individual if you think for one second that is "sums up defending Trump"
Seriously, you are beyond dumb dude. I thought for a while that you were just a troll messing around........WOW! You are seriously f'd up.
How is "Trump is doing great" SUPPORTING TRUMP? How you freaking moron?
In 4 weeks he's done more for America than Obama did in 8 years. That is a fact! It has nothing to do with "support". It has to do with reading a couple of newspapers every day and watching the news a couple of times. Anyone that doesn't see the mood of the country, the mood of the business world, the companies that have already committed jobs to the U.S., is simply a freaking liar like you. It is not defending, supporting, or apologizing. Does your brain work correctly?
This is the 5-6th time you've said "defending Trump" or "Trump apologists". You were asked for a link or any evidence. There's none. You're a liar. You even started a thread and ran away for your spot underneath the stairs.
The name of this thread is Clinton Foundation Stories. SB's excerpt said nothing of Trump. You're obsessed, you cannot read, or you're smoking crack.
Back under the stairs troll.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Jan 10, 2017 19:58:23 GMT -5
So, you "won". Trump is to be the next president. Clinton is no longer an issue. So how, exactly, do you go about defending Trump without mentioning Hillary Clinton? Algie, as long as the Clinton Foundation exists and the massive corruption that surrounds them remains buried like a rotted corpse they will remain an issue. They also have plans for Chelsie to continue in the family "business" so it would be good for it all to get exposed now. |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 10, 2017 20:38:24 GMT -5
'Trump is doing great and he's not even President yet."
That pretty much sums up you defending Trump'
You are one screwed up individual if you think for one second that is "sums up defending Trump"
Seriously, you are beyond dumb dude. I thought for a while that you were just a troll messing around........WOW! You are seriously f'd up.
How is "Trump is doing great" SUPPORTING TRUMP? How you freaking moron?
In 4 weeks he's done more for America than Obama did in 8 years. That is a fact! It has nothing to do with "support". It has to do with reading a couple of newspapers every day and watching the news a couple of times. Anyone that doesn't see the mood of the country, the mood of the business world, the companies that have already committed jobs to the U.S., is simply a freaking liar like you. It is not defending, supporting, or apologizing. Does your brain work correctly?
This is the 5-6th time you've said "defending Trump" or "Trump apologists". You were asked for a link or any evidence. There's none. You're a liar. You even started a thread and ran away for your spot underneath the stairs.
The name of this thread is Clinton Foundation Stories. SB's excerpt said nothing of Trump. You're obsessed, you cannot read, or you're smoking crack.
Back under the stairs troll.
How is "Trump is doing great" not supporting Trump? No, really..... tell me how that's not supporting Trump. Oh, please, tell me how great he's going to be. No, really, tell me what he's going to do. Why don't you tell us where you're seeing all these 'Trump apologists' you keep talking about, starting threads about, and lying about?
Provide a link, some credible data or proof.........or shut the f....k up.
Troll
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 10, 2017 20:43:25 GMT -5
Algie, as long as the Clinton Foundation exists and the massive corruption that surrounds them remains buried like a rotted corpse they will remain an issue. They also have plans for Chelsie to continue in the family "business" so it would be good for it all to get exposed now. Yeah, I remember when Backinblack created a post about the supposed "Clinton love child". After the election.... eh.... not so much. A non issue, evidently. The difference oh stupid one, was there were 5-6 different sources. I provided countless links, live interviews, youtube videos, and the guy actually did 2 live press conferences in DC and Las Vegas.
It wasn't some wet-dream-fantasy I had in my little crazy-mind about 'Trump apologists' because I ran out of safety pins to snuggle with.
The guy is real.
Did you eat paint chips as a kid?
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 10, 2017 20:55:03 GMT -5
So, you "won". Trump is to be the next president. Clinton is no longer an issue. So how, exactly, do you go about defending Trump without mentioning Hillary Clinton? Algie, as long as the Clinton Foundation exists and the massive corruption that surrounds them remains buried like a rotted corpse they will remain an issue. They also have plans for Chelsie to continue in the family "business" so it would be good for it all to get exposed now. Don't you get it? You can't mention the name Clinton ever again. You're a 'Trump supporter/apologist' if you do.
The scumbag, criminal, filthy, Arkansas-carnival-act twosome must rest in peace.
|
|
