|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 17, 2020 13:09:01 GMT -5
What about tea party Sarah Palin. You mean the republican woman who can see Russia from her front porch, the republican woman who reads every paper in the morning. The republican woman who single handedly lost the election for John McCain? That Sarah Palin? Whatever happened to her? She disappeared off the face of the earth. Kicked to the curb by her own party into the dust bin of history. Heh,
Scott Adams was talking today about how Democrats are more succeptible to fake news and hoaxes. Thanks for proving his theory!
|
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 17, 2020 16:47:17 GMT -5
For those with selected memories, here's a transcript:
‘I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there, and she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big, phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.’
Trump was making the comments in a tour bus near the studios for Days of Our Lives, where he was due to make a cameo in 2005. This cameo was being promoted by Access Hollywood, hosted by Billy Bush (cousin of politician Jeb and former president George W) and Arianne Zucker, who Trump then turned his attentions to:
‘Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful - I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star they let you do it. You can do anything.’
Bush sniggers, saying ‘whatever you want’, then Trump goes ‘Grab them by the pussy, you can do anything.’
There’s more, but you get the gist, don’t you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 17, 2020 16:51:06 GMT -5
What about tea party Sarah Palin. You mean the republican woman who can see Russia from her front porch, the republican woman who reads every paper in the morning. The republican woman who single handedly lost the election for John McCain? That Sarah Palin? Whatever happened to her? She disappeared off the face of the earth. Kicked to the curb by her own party into the dust bin of history. Heh,
Scott Adams was talking today about how Democrats are more succeptible to fake news and hoaxes. Thanks for proving his theory!
Are you quoting Scott Adams, the guy who used to write the Dilbert cartoon? Please tell me it's another Scott Adams. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 17, 2020 17:14:46 GMT -5
Heh,
Scott Adams was talking today about how Democrats are more succeptible to fake news and hoaxes. Thanks for proving his theory!
Are you quoting Scott Adams, the guy who used to write the Dilbert cartoon? Please tell me it's another Scott Adams. Nope, the same Scott Adams. I know, right? |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 18, 2020 6:34:04 GMT -5
For those with selected memories, here's a transcript: ‘I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldn’t get there, and she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big, phony tits and everything. She’s totally changed her look.’ Trump was making the comments in a tour bus near the studios for Days of Our Lives, where he was due to make a cameo in 2005. This cameo was being promoted by Access Hollywood, hosted by Billy Bush (cousin of politician Jeb and former president George W) and Arianne Zucker, who Trump then turned his attentions to: ‘Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know I’m automatically attracted to beautiful - I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star they let you do it. You can do anything.’ Bush sniggers, saying ‘whatever you want’, then Trump goes ‘ Grab them by the pussy, you can do anything.’ There’s more, but you get the gist, don’t you? I posted the quote in context above Speedy. |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 18, 2020 6:37:21 GMT -5
Heh,
Scott Adams was talking today about how Democrats are more succeptible to fake news and hoaxes. Thanks for proving his theory!
Are you quoting Scott Adams, the guy who used to write the Dilbert cartoon? Please tell me it's another Scott Adams. Yep. Smart guy.
I'm not sure that someone that literally believes that Palin said "I can see Russia from my front porch" has a whole lot of credibility. Eh?
|
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 18, 2020 8:06:57 GMT -5
Sure, move those goalposts off of your praise and admiration for a mysogynist who never possessed a moral compass to Sarah Palin, the iceberg the McCain titanic hit. Good on ya.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 18, 2020 10:24:14 GMT -5
Sure, move those goalposts off of your praise and admiration for a mysogynist who never possessed a moral compass to Sarah Palin, the iceberg the McCain titanic hit. Good on ya. Sure, and while we're at it let's completely ignore Mr. Biden digitizing a staff member back in the day m'kay? |
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 18, 2020 16:48:58 GMT -5
Why dont you start a new thread on that. Be brief and concise. Show your proof. Remember, comparisons with your leader will most likely overshadow any accusations you make so gird your loins and buckle up. Study up on the word hypocrite.
Now get to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 19, 2020 6:14:04 GMT -5
Why dont you start a new thread on that. Be brief and concise. Show your proof. Remember, comparisons with your leader will most likely overshadow any accusations you make so gird your loins and buckle up. Study up on the word hypocrite. Now get to it. Tara Reade can speak for herself and it's damning. It's especially damning to all the "believe all women" hypocrites that promoted a woman that couldn't remember the details of what she claimed to be the worst thing that ever happened to her. Tara Reade remembers the event in graphic detail. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 19, 2020 8:52:28 GMT -5
Why dont you start a new thread on that. Be brief and concise. Show your proof. Remember, comparisons with your leader will most likely overshadow any accusations you make so gird your loins and buckle up. Study up on the word hypocrite. Now get to it. Don't worry, there will be yet another book/tape released any time now more appropriate to this thread to get it back on the tracks. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 19, 2020 9:00:11 GMT -5
Why dont you start a new thread on that. Be brief and concise. Show your proof. Remember, comparisons with your leader will most likely overshadow any accusations you make so gird your loins and buckle up. Study up on the word hypocrite. Now get to it. Tara Reade can speak for herself and it's damning. It's especially damning to all the "believe all women" hypocrites that promoted a woman that couldn't remember the details of what she claimed to be the worst thing that ever happened to her. Tara Reade remembers the event in graphic detail. Did Tara take the Bar Exam or not? Did she obtain an undergraduate degree through a program for victims of abuse or not? It IS damning to hear her speak for herself. |
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 19, 2020 11:13:07 GMT -5
From what I read about Tara Reide, she seems like a pretty disturbed woman, who's known under a few different aliases, to fabricate stories and lies to get what she wants, usually money, as she lives in bankruptcy poverty taking advantage of older acquaintances who try to help her out of her tragic situation. Ironically, she speaks warmly of Biden.
If you're going to try to build a Biden scandal on this weak foundation, you're going to find yourself ostracized and alone like with your other pet HRC conspiracy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 19, 2020 12:32:26 GMT -5
Why dont you start a new thread on that. Be brief and concise. Show your proof. Remember, comparisons with your leader will most likely overshadow any accusations you make so gird your loins and buckle up. Study up on the word hypocrite. Now get to it. Tara Reade can speak for herself and it's damning. It's especially damning to all the "believe all women" hypocrites that promoted a woman that couldn't remember the details of what she claimed to be the worst thing that ever happened to her. Tara Reade remembers the event in graphic detail. Who are these "believe all women" hypocrites you speak of? Are you talking about yourself believing whatever Tara/Alexandra Read/McCabe or whatever alias she goes by says? Are you sure that's a good idea? You may want to think about that for a minute. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 19, 2020 16:43:08 GMT -5
Tara Reade can speak for herself and it's damning. It's especially damning to all the "believe all women" hypocrites that promoted a woman that couldn't remember the details of what she claimed to be the worst thing that ever happened to her. Tara Reade remembers the event in graphic detail. Who are these "believe all women" hypocrites you speak of? Are you talking about yourself believing whatever Tara/Alexandra Read/McCabe or whatever alias she goes by says? Are you sure that's a good idea? You may want to think about that for a minute. I.... think he's talking about the numerous allegations against Trump..... or something. |
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Sept 19, 2020 17:26:01 GMT -5
Yes, because trump is such an honest man. He would never lie to save his own skin. A real stand up guy. Those girls, hookers, generals and lawyers, dead veterans and all the anti-trump book authors including his own sister and press are all just sore losers.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 21, 2020 6:27:38 GMT -5
From what I read about Tara Reide, she seems like a pretty disturbed woman, who's known under a few different aliases, to fabricate stories and lies to get what she wants, usually money, as she lives in bankruptcy poverty taking advantage of older acquaintances who try to help her out of her tragic situation. Ironically, she speaks warmly of Biden. If you're going to try to build a Biden scandal on this weak foundation, you're going to find yourself ostracized and alone like with your other pet HRC conspiracy. Who is telling you this? As far as I know Tara Reide is genuine and has a well documented case against Biden, far better than the story tole by Christine Blassy Ford. Democrats have a long track record of demonizing and belittling anyone who gets in their way. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 21, 2020 9:49:13 GMT -5
From what I read about Tara Reide, she seems like a pretty disturbed woman, who's known under a few different aliases, to fabricate stories and lies to get what she wants, usually money, as she lives in bankruptcy poverty taking advantage of older acquaintances who try to help her out of her tragic situation. Ironically, she speaks warmly of Biden. If you're going to try to build a Biden scandal on this weak foundation, you're going to find yourself ostracized and alone like with your other pet HRC conspiracy. Who is telling you this? As far as I know Tara Reide is genuine and has a well documented case against Biden, far better than the story tole by Christine Blassy Ford. Democrats have a long track record of demonizing and belittling anyone who gets in their way. Did Tara take the Bar Exam or not? Did she obtain an undergraduate degree through a program for victims of abuse or not? It IS damning to hear her speak for herself. Simple questions, really. If you think she's genuine, what's your thoughts? Seems to me she's questionable. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 29, 2020 15:18:11 GMT -5
From what I read about Tara Reide, she seems like a pretty disturbed woman, who's known under a few different aliases, to fabricate stories and lies to get what she wants, usually money, as she lives in bankruptcy poverty taking advantage of older acquaintances who try to help her out of her tragic situation. Ironically, she speaks warmly of Biden. If you're going to try to build a Biden scandal on this weak foundation, you're going to find yourself ostracized and alone like with your other pet HRC conspiracy. Who is telling you this? As far as I know Tara Reide is genuine and has a well documented case against Biden, far better than the story tole by Christine Blassy Ford. Democrats have a long track record of demonizing and belittling anyone who gets in their way. Interesting how Butler refuses to answer simple questions. Did Tara take the Bar Exam or not? Did she obtain an undergraduate degree through a program for victims of abuse or not? Because it IS damning to hear her speak for herself, no? |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 30, 2020 10:26:49 GMT -5
Who is telling you this? As far as I know Tara Reide is genuine and has a well documented case against Biden, far better than the story tole by Christine Blassy Ford. Democrats have a long track record of demonizing and belittling anyone who gets in their way. Interesting how Butler refuses to answer simple questions. Did Tara take the Bar Exam or not? Did she obtain an undergraduate degree through a program for victims of abuse or not? Because it IS damning to hear her speak for herself, no? Why is this germane to the question of Biden's stinky finger? |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 30, 2020 11:17:01 GMT -5
Because she has a history of exaggeration and lying. You really should do some due diligence, yah know.
You're frickin unbelievable.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 30, 2020 11:36:51 GMT -5
Because she has a history of exaggeration and lying. You really should do some due diligence, yah know. You're frickin unbelievable. You've said that but I haven't seen anything remotely resembling proof to back it up. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 30, 2020 11:39:14 GMT -5
Odd, because there's no proof that she did.
|
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 30, 2020 13:28:21 GMT -5
Odd, because there's no proof that she did. There actually is. Her mother contemporaneously referenced the incident on a CSPAN call. She also has people that support her contention that she told them about it shortly after it happened. And then there's this: www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.htmlIs this absolute proof? Naa, but it's a lot more than DOCTOR Christine Blasey Ford had. |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Sept 30, 2020 17:12:16 GMT -5
Odd, because there's no proof that she did. There actually is. Her mother contemporaneously referenced the incident on a CSPAN call. She also has people that support her contention that she told them about it shortly after it happened. And then there's this: www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.htmlIs this absolute proof? Naa, but it's a lot more than DOCTOR Christine Blasey Ford had. You're confused about my line of questioning. Tara has claimed that she took the Bar Exam as well as that she had obtained an undergraduate degree through a program for victims of abuse; the later is particularly..... germane to the allegation of sexual misconduct.... because there's no proof of such program, and there's no evidence she took the Bar Exam. Don't you think that someone who has claimed to have benefitted from a program for victims of abuse that doesn't even exist might be lying about being the victim of sexual abuse?Seems like a pretty germane question to me. |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 1, 2020 7:01:17 GMT -5
There actually is. Her mother contemporaneously referenced the incident on a CSPAN call. She also has people that support her contention that she told them about it shortly after it happened. And then there's this: www.sanluisobispo.com/news/politics-government/article242527331.htmlIs this absolute proof? Naa, but it's a lot more than DOCTOR Christine Blasey Ford had. You're confused about my line of questioning. Tara has claimed that she took the Bar Exam as well as that she had obtained an undergraduate degree through a program for victims of abuse; the later is particularly..... germane to the allegation of sexual misconduct.... because there's no proof of such program, and there's no evidence she took the Bar Exam. Don't you think that someone who has claimed to have benefitted from a program for victims of abuse that doesn't even exist might be lying about being the victim of sexual abuse?Seems like a pretty germane question to me. You're making assertions without providing any evidence of same. Why should I believe any of this? |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 1, 2020 8:34:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Oct 1, 2020 16:51:48 GMT -5
You're confused about my line of questioning. Tara has claimed that she took the Bar Exam as well as that she had obtained an undergraduate degree through a program for victims of abuse; the later is particularly..... germane to the allegation of sexual misconduct.... because there's no proof of such program, and there's no evidence she took the Bar Exam. Don't you think that someone who has claimed to have benefitted from a program for victims of abuse that doesn't even exist might be lying about being the victim of sexual abuse?Seems like a pretty germane question to me. You're making assertions without providing any evidence of same. Why should I believe any of this? Dude.... really? Reade professed to have obtained the undergraduate degree through an alleged program for victims of abuse that protected her identity and also that her degree was fast-tracked by the president of the university at the time, Tullise Murdock. The university said that no protected program had existed and Murdock said there had been no special arrangements |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 2, 2020 8:29:47 GMT -5
You're making assertions without providing any evidence of same. Why should I believe any of this? Dude.... really? Reade professed to have obtained the undergraduate degree through an alleged program for victims of abuse that protected her identity and also that her degree was fast-tracked by the president of the university at the time, Tullise Murdock. The university said that no protected program had existed and Murdock said there had been no special arrangements You keep saying things and continue to fail to provide links to where you got the info. Unless you know this by personal experience? |
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Oct 2, 2020 12:46:26 GMT -5
Dude.... really? Reade professed to have obtained the undergraduate degree through an alleged program for victims of abuse that protected her identity and also that her degree was fast-tracked by the president of the university at the time, Tullise Murdock. The university said that no protected program had existed and Murdock said there had been no special arrangements You keep saying things and continue to fail to provide links to where you got the info. Unless you know this by personal experience? Oh yeah.... totally from personal experience... because I looked her up on the internet all by myself. Like an adult. You know, I was leaving you breadcrumbs along the way thinking you'd follow along. But no, willful ignorance and all... I get it... you get a scrap, a shiny little sh!t nugget... and you run with it.... without due diligence... or you simply ignore what you find. Nasty habit there. But to humor you, here's a link to start you off on a voyage of discovery. And I know, I know, it's only one little link from a site you'll likely claim isn't reputable. But it has footnotes, citations, and links to other sources. And I know it's more than a 240 character tweet that you kids are so fond of. Here it is, for what it's worth..... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden_sexual_assault_allegationStill though, without context, would you think that someone who has claimed to have benefitted from a program for victims of abuse that doesn't even exist might be lying about being the victim of sexual abuse? |
|
