|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 10:41:19 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 10:41:19 GMT -5
It looks like Trump has been tricked into believing that Assad gassed his own citizens. If he starts a war with Syria then he is a certified fool. He is already talking about taking military action even though he has no idea who is responsible. This is very dangerous, and very irresponsible. I hope he smartens up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 10:42:35 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 10:42:35 GMT -5
How do you know it wasn't Syria?
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 10:52:33 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 10:52:33 GMT -5
How do you know it wasn't Syria? i'm not responding to questions that were answered in the video. you're a small minded time waster and i have no interest in entertaining you.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 10:55:49 GMT -5
Post by StalkingButler on Apr 6, 2017 10:55:49 GMT -5
How do you know it wasn't Syria? We don't for sure. We do know, however, that Syria would have gained nothing from a sarin attack and has much to lose. Trump needs to tread very carefully here.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 11:06:02 GMT -5
Post by theremedy on Apr 6, 2017 11:06:02 GMT -5
godvernment doesn't like it when people ask him for his opinion. He's rather have a video or web site speak for him. Tells me he is incapable of having his own thoughts on something.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 11:14:15 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 11:14:15 GMT -5
How do you know it wasn't Syria? We don't for sure. We do know, however, that Syria would have gained nothing from a sarin attack and has much to lose. Trump needs to tread very carefully here. They 'gain' the same thing that they 'gain' by bombing schools, hospitals and innocent civilians ... inflicting death and terror on their enemies. Geez ... I thought that would be pretty obvious.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 11:17:58 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 11:17:58 GMT -5
How do you know it wasn't Syria? i'm not responding to questions that were answered in the video. you're a small minded time waster and i have no interest in entertaining you. Who produced the video? Who's the guy in the video? How do you know that Russia didn't give these chemical weapons to Assad when they were in-country helping him kill the same people who were targets of this chemical weapons attack? How do you know if it's not just propaganda from the Assad gov't? So you're just basically telling people to believe your source over another source even though you have no idea who your source is, what their motivations are or who they are aligned with ... got it Geepers ... talk about 'small minded waste of space' ... throwing out unsourced, unknown videos and then getting defensive when people ask basic, logical questions.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:00:16 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 12:00:16 GMT -5
you sound like you're foaming at the mouth and ready to send some 18 year olds to war
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:03:03 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 12:03:03 GMT -5
you sound like you're foaming at the mouth and ready to send some 18 year olds to war That's funny ... because I think I sound like a skeptic who is revealing how gullible you are. And by-the-by spanky ... I have only asked questions ... so take your assumptions and shove them back up your ass where they belong.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:07:10 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 12:07:10 GMT -5
you sound like you're foaming at the mouth and ready to send some 18 year olds to war That's funny ... because I think I sound like a skeptic who is revealing how gullible you are. And by-the-by spanky ... I have only asked questions ... so take your assumptions and shove them back up your ass where they belong. oh you're a skeptic? so you're admitting that you don't know who is responsible?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:09:47 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 12:09:47 GMT -5
That's funny ... because I think I sound like a skeptic who is revealing how gullible you are. And by-the-by spanky ... I have only asked questions ... so take your assumptions and shove them back up your ass where they belong. oh you're a skeptic? so you're admitting that you don't know who is responsible? That's right dipstick ... I never made any supposition as to who did what. You, on the other hand, seem to think you just 'know' stuff ... even though you can't even answer basic questions about the autheticity of your 'source'.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:14:57 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 12:14:57 GMT -5
oh you're a skeptic? so you're admitting that you don't know who is responsible? That's right dipstick ... I never made any supposition as to who did what. You, on the other hand, seem to think you just 'know' stuff ... even though you can't even answer basic questions about the autheticity of your 'source'. well you did assert that Assad has done similar things in the past so... but as far as the guy in the video, he's a journalist. and he's not a source, he isn't offering any insider information. it's called logic and reasoning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:22:53 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 12:22:53 GMT -5
That's right dipstick ... I never made any supposition as to who did what. You, on the other hand, seem to think you just 'know' stuff ... even though you can't even answer basic questions about the autheticity of your 'source'. well you did assert that Assad has done similar things in the past so... but as far as the guy in the video, he's a journalist. and he's not a source, he isn't offering any insider information. it's called logic and reasoning. Ther ya go making your own ASSumptions, again. So he has no evidence, no insider information and no source ... so he's basically guessing ... and you are propogating it as fact. Yeah, that sounds about right coming from you.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:32:17 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 12:32:17 GMT -5
well you did assert that Assad has done similar things in the past so... but as far as the guy in the video, he's a journalist. and he's not a source, he isn't offering any insider information. it's called logic and reasoning. Ther ya go making your own ASSumptions, again. So he has no evidence, no insider information and no source ... so he's basically guessing ... and you are propogating it as fact. Yeah, that sounds about right coming from you. oh fo sho i'm assuming and i'd put money that my assumption is right. my main concern is trump waiting for evidence before acting one way or the other.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:32:21 GMT -5
Post by StalkingButler on Apr 6, 2017 12:32:21 GMT -5
The liberal hawks and neocons that are calling for war have no more information than the rest of us.
That said, we know that ISIS and other rebel groups have been experimenting with poison gas and recently Seymour Hersh (grain of salt there) has accused Hillary of sending chemical WMD from Libya to Syria so there's certainly enough out there to be cynical when someone points a finger at Assad and tells us that we should be going to war.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:39:57 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 12:39:57 GMT -5
The liberal hawks and neocons that are calling for war have no more information than the rest of us. That said, we know that ISIS and other rebel groups have been experimenting with poison gas and recently Seymour Hersh (grain of salt there) has accused Hillary of sending chemical WMD from Libya to Syria so there's certainly enough out there to be cynical when someone points a finger at Assad and tells us that we should be going to war. So all those spec-ops forces we have in Syria embedded with the various groups fighting Assad wouldn't be gathering intel or anything like that? They wouldn't have eyes and ears on the situation going on all around them? And if they did gather intel, all of it would be made public so that ISIL, Syria, Russia know exactly what we know and how we know it. Yep, sounds 'logical'. */sarcasm off/*
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:48:49 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 12:48:49 GMT -5
The liberal hawks and neocons that are calling for war have no more information than the rest of us. That said, we know that ISIS and other rebel groups have been experimenting with poison gas and recently Seymour Hersh (grain of salt there) has accused Hillary of sending chemical WMD from Libya to Syria so there's certainly enough out there to be cynical when someone points a finger at Assad and tells us that we should be going to war. So all those spec-ops forces we have in Syria embedded with the various groups fighting Assad wouldn't be gathering intel or anything like that? They wouldn't have eyes and ears on the situation going on all around them? And if they did gather intel, all of it would be made public so that ISIL, Syria, Russia know exactly what we know and how we know it. Yep, sounds 'logical'. */sarcasm off/* exactly, just like the weapons of mass destruction in iraq. they were there, our daddy government wouldn't lie. you know how many spec-ops we had in iraq we had eyes and ears on every situation. you see daddy gov still hasn't provided evidence because they don't want to let isis know what we know and how we know it, but big daddy government knows everything. all we gotta do is sit back, take their word as scripture, and lick boots.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 12:54:14 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 12:54:14 GMT -5
So all those spec-ops forces we have in Syria embedded with the various groups fighting Assad wouldn't be gathering intel or anything like that? They wouldn't have eyes and ears on the situation going on all around them? And if they did gather intel, all of it would be made public so that ISIL, Syria, Russia know exactly what we know and how we know it. Yep, sounds 'logical'. */sarcasm off/* exactly, just like the weapons of mass destruction in iraq. they were there, our daddy government wouldn't lie. you know how many spec-ops we had in iraq we had eyes and ears on every situation. you see daddy gov still hasn't provided evidence because they don't want to let isis know what we know and how we know it, but big daddy government knows everything. all we gotta do is sit back, take their word as scripture, and lick boots. Heh, heh, heh ... now you're just lying ... again. We had no spec-ops in Iraq, that would've have been stupid ... even for baby-Bush ... to send spec-ops into the heart of the country, unsupported and unable to carry enough supplies for any meaningful duration, in order to observe facilities that are buried under ground. Exactly what intel could a guy with eyes and ears on a mountain gain that we wouldn't get from satellites that are able to read license plates? You've been reading waaay too many comic books spanky. Of course your posts begs an obvious question ... Why do you think that your video guy isn't just as wrong or just as intent on pushing a particular agenda as any other source?
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 14:33:55 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 14:33:55 GMT -5
exactly, just like the weapons of mass destruction in iraq. they were there, our daddy government wouldn't lie. you know how many spec-ops we had in iraq we had eyes and ears on every situation. you see daddy gov still hasn't provided evidence because they don't want to let isis know what we know and how we know it, but big daddy government knows everything. all we gotta do is sit back, take their word as scripture, and lick boots. Heh, heh, heh ... now you're just lying ... again. We had no spec-ops in Iraq, that would've have been stupid ... even for baby-Bush ... to send spec-ops into the heart of the country, unsupported and unable to carry enough supplies for any meaningful duration, in order to observe facilities that are buried under ground. Exactly what intel could a guy with eyes and ears on a mountain gain that we wouldn't get from satellites that are able to read license plates? You've been reading waaay too many comic books spanky. Of course your posts begs an obvious question ... Why do you think that your video guy isn't just as wrong or just as intent on pushing a particular agenda as any other source? because it makes sense, there's no lies, and there's no deception. everything he says is verifiable and plausible. and what would his agenda be? what would he be trying to accomplish. we know a false flag has the ability to accomplish obama, hillary, and israel's agenda of getting american troops into syria.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 14:43:52 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 14:43:52 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... now you're just lying ... again. We had no spec-ops in Iraq, that would've have been stupid ... even for baby-Bush ... to send spec-ops into the heart of the country, unsupported and unable to carry enough supplies for any meaningful duration, in order to observe facilities that are buried under ground. Exactly what intel could a guy with eyes and ears on a mountain gain that we wouldn't get from satellites that are able to read license plates? You've been reading waaay too many comic books spanky. Of course your posts begs an obvious question ... Why do you think that your video guy isn't just as wrong or just as intent on pushing a particular agenda as any other source? because it makes sense, there's no lies, and there's no deception. everything he says is verifiable and plausible. and what would his agenda be? what would he be trying to accomplish. we know a false flag has the ability to accomplish obama, hillary, and israel's agenda of getting american troops into syria. Oh geez ... so you just 'know' there's no 'deception' ? None of what he says regarding the actual attack is verifiable ... you even said so yourself ... " he's not a source, he isn't offering any insider information"What you are describing is your own confirmation bias and reveals your conspiracy addled thought process ... nothing more. What we know is that every side in that war has the incentive to mislead and propagandize every event.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 15:11:40 GMT -5
Post by godvernment on Apr 6, 2017 15:11:40 GMT -5
because it makes sense, there's no lies, and there's no deception. everything he says is verifiable and plausible. and what would his agenda be? what would he be trying to accomplish. we know a false flag has the ability to accomplish obama, hillary, and israel's agenda of getting american troops into syria. Oh geez ... so you just 'know' there's no 'deception' ? None of what he says regarding the actual attack is verifiable ... you even said so yourself ... " he's not a source, he isn't offering any insider information"What you are describing is your own confirmation bias and reveals your conspiracy addled thought process ... nothing more. What we know is that every side in that war has the incentive to mislead and propagandize every event. The EU immediately condemned Assad without evidence. FACT The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has supervised the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons in 2014. FACT Since 2014, various Rebel groups in Syria have used chemical weapons. FACT since the attack, the rebel terrorists have been calling on the west to intervene and assist in their attack on Assad. there lies their motive and agenda. what is Assad's agenda and motive for a chemical attack on his own civilians.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 16:21:36 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 16:21:36 GMT -5
Oh geez ... so you just 'know' there's no 'deception' ? None of what he says regarding the actual attack is verifiable ... you even said so yourself ... " he's not a source, he isn't offering any insider information"What you are describing is your own confirmation bias and reveals your conspiracy addled thought process ... nothing more. What we know is that every side in that war has the incentive to mislead and propagandize every event. The EU immediately condemned Assad without evidence. FACT The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has supervised the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons in 2014. FACT Since 2014, various Rebel groups in Syria have used chemical weapons. FACT since the attack, the rebel terrorists have been calling on the west to intervene and assist in their attack on Assad. there lies their motive and agenda. what is Assad's agenda and motive for a chemical attack on his own civilians. FACT: Russia develops chemical weapons FACT: Russia has deployed troops and equipment to Syria since 2014 FACT: Russia has a history of supplying weapons to Syria ... including selling them the capacity to produce chemical weapons themselves. There are just as many, if not more, damning facts pointing at Russia/Syria as rebels ... especially considering that there is no actual rebel army but rather a disparate group of various ideologues often fighting each other ... similar to the whacko wingnut party.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 16:29:31 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 16:29:31 GMT -5
The EU immediately condemned Assad without evidence. FACT The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons has supervised the destruction of Syria's chemical weapons in 2014. FACT Since 2014, various Rebel groups in Syria have used chemical weapons. FACT since the attack, the rebel terrorists have been calling on the west to intervene and assist in their attack on Assad. there lies their motive and agenda. what is Assad's agenda and motive for a chemical attack on his own civilians. FACT: Russia develops chemical weapons FACT: Russia has deployed troops and equipment to Syria since 2014 FACT: Russia has a history of supplying weapons to Syria ... including selling them the capacity to produce chemical weapons themselves. There are just as many, if not more, damning facts pointing at Russia/Syria as there is implicating the rebels ... especially considering that there is no actual rebel army but rather a disparate group of various ideologues often fighting each other ... similar to the whacko wingnut party. Assad 'gains' the same thing that he 'gains' by bombing schools, hospitals and innocent civilians ... inflicting death and terror on his enemies. Geez ... I thought that would be pretty obvious.
|
|
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 17:13:11 GMT -5
Post by StalkingButler on Apr 6, 2017 17:13:11 GMT -5
Questions... Who replaces Assad if he's deposed? The last.time this happened didn't work out so well. Also, who is going the prevent the inevitable genocide against the Alawites when the Syrian army is gone? Finally, what if Russia decides to make a stand? Admittedly, it's less likely now that Mr. Red Line is now back at his real job as celebrity to the celebrities but it still could happen.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Syria
Apr 6, 2017 17:19:48 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 17:19:48 GMT -5
Questions... Who replaces Assad if he's deposed? The last.time this happened didn't work out so well. Also, who is going the prevent the inevitable genocide against the Alawites when the Syrian army is gone? Finally, what if Russia decides to make a stand? Admittedly, it's less likely now that Mr. Red Line is now back at his real job as celebrity to the celebrities but it still could happen. Say it ain't so ... The Liar-in-Chief quit to go back to his alt-reality show? Do tell ... Trump said that it “crosses many, many lines, beyond a red line.”
|
|