Time for the Scientific Community to Admit We Were Wrong

What the f...k are you talking about and nice try at changing the subject.  Are you trying to out-RETARD your RETARDED alter-ego?

As the thread title says....It's Time for the MORONS that LIED for 3 years to admit they were wrong!

Vaccines didn't work and THEY KNEW IT!
Masks didn't work and THEY KNEW IT!

Shut the f...k up RETARD!

He couldn't have his badly researched long shot HCQ after being told he'd be able to jump higher and run away faster from the schoolyard bullies so he rallied against a legit vaccine. Then he went and conjured up some flawed data that it was a dem plot to destroy the economy and a Fauci plan to kill all humans. Of course he decided anything that saved people was obviously a gubmit plot to inject trackers into the citizens. So he avoided all virus precautions and came down with the virus himself. The book is writing itself. Too bad the main character is such a numbnut.

Yeah, well, your whole "we were told" bull crap is incredibly flawed and shows how little you actually listened to what was being said. And how is it considered "changing the subject" when I point out that we were also told by you that Hydroxychloroquine was the cure for Covid? You wouldn't shut up about it.... until you realized how wrong you were, but you'd never admit it though.

So all things considered, my post is, in fact, on point. I'm sure, however, that you'd like to say how I never debate or add anything here blah blah blah......

WTF are you two (oooops I mean ONE) RETARD talking about?

I said sh! t "nearly three years ago" To who? WTF are you talking about?
Am I a doctor? CDC? NIH? Walensky? Fauci? You are sooooo f....king RETARDED you think an anonymous person on a message board should be suggesting Hydroxychloroquine?

"Legit vaccine" LMAO LOL LOL LOL! Can you read ANYTHING?
The vaccine is a complete farce NOW PROVEN!
Masks are a complete farce NOW PROVEN

And you are a RETARD....NOW PROVEN!

Hey Karen-RETARD.........can you stay on topic on ANYTHING?  Can you debate ANYTHING?  Gawd......if we all lived our life 3 years in the past wondering and hoping if an anonymous poster spoke of a potential helpful drug during a pandemic where/when doctors were desperately looking for any type of cure or solution, trying everything known to man.......and again...3 YEARS LATER bringing that back up because you're getting pummeled in a debate......this would sure be a sadder place than you and your RETARDED alter ego have already made it.

Sheeeesh!
Stick to the facts and debate little Karen-RETARD!  

Vaccines don't/didn't work
Masks don't/didn't work
Shutdowns don't/didn't work
Distancing didn't/doesn't work

All of this was known by Fauci, Walensky, Tedros, Biden, Birx, and also "Everyone With Brains Knew This"!

You have a funny way of admitting you were wrong. And, again, I'm certainly staying on topic by pointing out something that everyone with brains knew... that HCL does not work against Covid 19. But idiots, like you, kept touting how incredibly successful it was... but now... not so much.... more like not at all. And who's this anonymous poster you keep going on about? I'm talking about you numb nuts. You said HCL worked and anyone who knew differently
was... *checks notes*.. a "LYING motherfvcker". Yeah.... you said that.

You really are a vile POS.

Hey Karen......thanks for taking my medical advice on an anonymous message board.  I hope you used the drug and got all kinds of creepy side effects like mental retardation, split personality, numbness of the brain, and a lim p pe c k er.  Ohhhhh....I'm sorry, you had all those things already.

As I remember, there were many, many, cases of Covid where the patient used hydrochloroquine and it worked.  One in particular, (in Illinois I think) where it was a senator or a congressman, or a mayor, or some political-type...that was all over the news raving about the drug's success and results.  The Cartoon Network probably didn't show that though so you didn't see it.

The POINT, you little KAREN-RETARD-dope, is that I'm not Fauci, Walensky, Birx, Tedros, the CDC, the WHO, or freakin Dr. Quinn-Medicine Show....I'm someone reading data and doing a little research to PROVE you WRONG every day cuz you and your alter-ego are RETARDS with big mouths and no brains.

Pick up a newspaper, watch a reliable news show, do some research,....and then TELL THE TRUTH you freakin s c u  m b ag!
COVID CAME FROM A WUHAN LAB AND CHINA, FAUCI, CDC, WHO, WALENSKY, ETC...ALL KNEW! .....and, as the thread title says: "it's time for the scientific community to admit they lied!"

Does anyone know what the Ho was right about? Lets see, we broke the back of Covid obviously without his help when he was denying everything while he was in bed for two weeks with the virus himself because everything was a Fauci scam to kill the human race. Maybe taking his diseased a$$ off the street was what caused it from spreading anymore. Oh wait, he says it's still spreading. But nothing works? Maybe he shouldve taken HCL. But wait, the virus has diminished, But wait, people are still dying. Whats an idiot supposed to do? I know, change your story.

You f.....king RETARD!

The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?

Feb. 21, 2023

The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of Covid-19 — was published late last month. Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is its lead author, were unambiguous. “There is just no evidence that they — masks — make any difference, Full stop.”

But, wait, hold on. What about N-95 masks, as opposed to lower-quality surgical or cloth masks? “Makes no difference — none of it,” said Jefferson. What about the studies that initially persuaded policymakers to impose mask mandates?  “They were convinced by nonrandomized studies, flawed observational studies.”  What about the utility of masks in conjunction with other preventive measures, such as hand hygiene, physical distancing or air filtration?  “There’s no evidence that any of these things make any difference.”

These observations don’t come from just anywhere. Jefferson and 11 colleagues conducted the study for Cochrane, a British nonprofit that is widely considered the gold standard for its reviews of health care data. The conclusions were based on 78 randomized controlled trials during the Covid pandemic, with a total of 610,872 participants in multiple countries. And they track what has been widely observed in the United States: States with mask mandates fared no better against Covid than those without.

When it comes to the population-level benefits of masking, the verdict is in: Mask mandates were a bust. Those skeptics who were furiously mocked as cranks and occasionally censored as “misinformers” for opposing mandates were right. The mainstream experts and pundits who supported mandates were wrong. In a better world, it would behoove the latter group to acknowledge their error, along with its considerable physical, psychological, pedagogical and political costs.

Don’t count on it. In congressional testimony this month, Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, called into question the Cochrane analysis’s reliance on a small number of Covid-specific randomized controlled trials and insisted that her agency’s guidance on masking in schools wouldn’t change. If she ever wonders why respect for the C.D.C. keeps falling, she could look to herself, and resign, and leave it to someone else to reorganize her agency.  That, too, probably won’t happen: We no longer live in a culture in which resignation is seen as the honorable course for public officials who fail in their jobs.

But the costs go deeper. When people say they “trust the science,” what they presumably mean is that science is rational, empirical, rigorous, receptive to new information, sensitive to competing concerns and risks. Also: humble, transparent, open to criticism, honest about what it doesn’t know, willing to admit error.

The C.D.C.’s increasingly mindless adherence to its masking guidance is none of those things. It isn’t merely undermining the trust it requires to operate as an effective public institution. It is turning itself into an unwitting accomplice to the genuine enemies of reason and science — conspiracy theorists and quack-cure peddlers — by so badly representing the values and practices that science is supposed to exemplify.
It also betrays the technocratic mind-set that has the unpleasant habit of assuming that nothing is ever wrong with the bureaucracy’s well-laid plans — provided nobody gets in its way, nobody has a dissenting point of view, everyone does exactly what it asks, and for as long as officialdom demands. This is the mentality that once believed that China provided a highly successful model for pandemic response.



Again....you f....king RETARD!

Everyone with brains knew this.... mask wearing slows the spread of Covid.... full stop. Effing heck!



"Here’s Why the Science Is Clear That Masks Work"

www.nytimes.com/2023/03/10/opinion/masks-work-cochrane-study.html



"No, That New Study Doesn’t Show that Masks Are Useless"

insights.som.yale.edu/insights/no-that-new-study-doesnt-show-that-masks-are-useless



"How the Cochrane Review went wrong. Report questioning COVID masks blows up, prompts apology"

www.thestar.com/news/canada/2023/03/10/how-the-cochrane-review-went-wrong-report-questioning-covid-masks-blows-up-prompts-apology.html



"Many commentators have claimed that a recently-updated Cochrane Review shows that 'masks don't work', which is an inaccurate and misleading interpretation."

www.cochrane.org/news/statement-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses-review



"Cochrane Says Review Does Not Show That ‘Face Masks Don’t Work’ Against Covid-19"

www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2023/03/11/cochrane-says-review-does-not-show-that-face-masks-dont-work-against-covid-19/?sh=5bc5cb601937



"Multiple studies show that face masks reduce the spread of COVID-19; a Cochrane review doesn’t demonstrate otherwise"

healthfeedback.org/claimreview/multiple-studies-show-face-masks-reduce-spread-of-covid-19-cochrane-review-doesnt-demonstrate-otherwise/


Looks like you owe us two apologies there, doesn't it?

LMAO!  Sorry but, we'll take the Oxford-Star-Head-Epidemiologist over the NY Times, Star magazine, Forbes, and Yale EDU......k Karen/RETARD?

LMAO!  Sorry but, we'll take the Oxford-Star-Head-Epidemiologist over the NY Times, Star magazine, Forbes, and Yale EDU......k Karen/RETARD?