Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 17:30:14 GMT -5
Hey dipshit ... why don't your links point to actual data rather than the echo chambers spewing that swill you keep swallowing? Because you are literally too freaking stupid to read for yourself ... you need your wingnut betters spoon feeding bullshit so you know what to regurgitate. There are 5.5 Million unfilled jobs in the country ... half of them in business/professional/healthcare ... and over 3 Million of all unfilled jobs are in the whacko wingnut fly over states of the midwest and the wingnut south ... so like you, these wingnuts are literally to freaking stupid and lazy to get a real job with good pay and real benefits. www.bls.gov/news.release/jolts.a.htmAgain stupid......the 3 links I posted earlier from Bureau of Labor Statistics, the CBO, and the Census DO CITE ACTUAL DATA you moron!
Stop your freakin lies!
There are 96-97 million out of the workforce. Lowest labor participation in 40-50 years. Why are you denying this fact?
Or......you're not denying it, you're lying, as usual.
zerohedgefund and cnsnews are gov't agencies? Even someone as stupid as you should be able to see the diffrence ... obviously you're stupider than anyone imagined. So why did the LFPR decline before the wingnut-led financial and housing disasters? How was the CBO able to accurately predict in 2006 ... 3 yrs before Obama took office ... that it would continue to fall if they didn't even know which party would be in the whitehouse ... never mind who would actually be PotUS? Ya see, dipshit ... you are too f()cking stupid to apply basic logic. The workforce is getting older and RETIRING. The CBO was able to predict the drop in the LFPR because contrary to you f()cking ignorance of reality ... people age and no one has actually found a way to reverse time or a fountain of youth. You are really a f()cking moron who can't even get a decent job with benefits ... never mind form an argument without a wingnut echo chamber telling you what to think.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 29, 2017 17:34:31 GMT -5
'zerohedgefund and cnsnews are gov't agencies?"
They're the vehicles stupid. You have to read and see who they cite......you know, where they're actually getting their FACTUAL data.
Pssst......it's from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and it's awell known formula, and oh yah....it includes the VERY definition of Labor Participation Rate.
Stop lying and sober up.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 29, 2017 17:37:37 GMT -5
Your life hit a bump in 2012/2013 and you are still whining about it. OMG...everybody has bumps in their lives, bumps a lot worse than the one that hit you. It is called life. Yah, kind of like you and other Libs are still "whining" Bush's fault from 8 freaking years ago.
Idiot.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 29, 2017 17:40:50 GMT -5
'zerohedgefund and cnsnews are gov't agencies?"
They're the vehicles stupid. You have to read and see who they cite......you know, where they're actually getting their FACTUAL data. Pssst......it's from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and it's awell known formula, and oh yah....it includes the VERY definition of Labor Participation Rate. Stop lying and sober up. And zerohedge and cns were citing millennials, not the participation rate, decline in median income, and GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months. Those were the other links.
So, as I knew, you didn't read one f.....king thing and you're just spewing lies as usual.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 18:02:08 GMT -5
'zerohedgefund and cnsnews are gov't agencies?"
They're the vehicles stupid. You have to read and see who they cite......you know, where they're actually getting their FACTUAL data. Pssst......it's from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and it's awell known formula, and oh yah....it includes the VERY definition of Labor Participation Rate. Stop lying and sober up. And zerohedge and cns were citing millennials, not the participation rate, decline in median income, and GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months. Those were the other links.
So, as I knew, you didn't read one f.....king thing and you're just spewing lies as usual.
Now you are just outright f()cking lying. GDP for the entire year in 2015 was 2.6% ... and as recently as Q3 2016 the GDP was 3.5%As per the FEDERAL RESERVE. fred.stlouisfed.org/release/tables?rid=53&eid=13690The same FEDERAL RESERVE also shows that median household income has been rising steadily after bottoming out after the latest and greatest whacko wingnut financial clusterf()k since the depression of the 30's ... and in 2015 the median income recorded it's largest single-year gain in the last 30+ yrs, rising 7%. fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672NWhy do you bother to post here when all you do is regurgitate echo chamber bullshit ... and then outright lie about even the most basic facts. You are quite the useful idiot for Trumpo-the-Dumbo and his cavalcade of 'alternate facts'.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 13:59:44 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 14:08:42 GMT -5
Oh spanky ... now you're trying to weasel out of what you said .... pathetic little loser who can't get a real job. You said: " GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months" ... Which is an obvious lie. Then you said: " decline in median income" ... Which is another obvious lie. Just f()ck-off already ... slapping you around with facts and then watching you trying to deny what you posted right here in pixels for all to see is tiresome and not worth my time. Why don't you spend your time trying to get a real job ... unless you just know you too f()cking stupid that no one would hire you.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 14:32:36 GMT -5
Oh spanky ... now you're trying to weasel out of what you said .... pathetic little loser who can't get a real job. You said: " GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months" ... Which is an obvious lie. Then you said: " decline in median income" ... Which is another obvious lie. Just f()ck-off already ... slapping you around with facts and then watching you trying to deny what you posted right here in pixels for all to see is tiresome and not worth my time. Why don't you spend your time trying to get a real job ... unless you just know you too f()cking stupid that no one would hire you. It must be hard to go through life not understanding what things mean. I feel bad for you.
It's also funny how your "spot-amnesia" came on so quick? After 10 short days of Obambi being gone.
You're right actually, there was ONE of the 32 quarters where GDP did go over 3%.....(it was promptly adjusted)
Median Family income Jan 2009 =$54,118 Median family income Oct 2017 =$53, 622
Keep the lies coming spanky
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 14:41:35 GMT -5
Oh spanky ... now you're trying to weasel out of what you said .... pathetic little loser who can't get a real job. You said: " GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months" ... Which is an obvious lie. Then you said: " decline in median income" ... Which is another obvious lie. Just f()ck-off already ... slapping you around with facts and then watching you trying to deny what you posted right here in pixels for all to see is tiresome and not worth my time. Why don't you spend your time trying to get a real job ... unless you just know you too f()cking stupid that no one would hire you. It must be hard to go through life not understanding what things mean. I feel bad for you.
It's also funny how your "spot-amnesia" came on so quick? After 10 short days of Obambi being gone.
You're right actually, there was ONE of the 32 quarters where GDP did go over 3%.....(it was promptly adjusted)
Median Family income Jan 2009 =$54,118 Median family income Oct 2017 =$53, 622
Keep the lies coming spanky
You said " GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months" you f()cking lying piece-of-shit ... now it's 3%? Where's your source for your median income ... with dates.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 15:00:27 GMT -5
It must be hard to go through life not understanding what things mean. I feel bad for you.
It's also funny how your "spot-amnesia" came on so quick? After 10 short days of Obambi being gone.
You're right actually, there was ONE of the 32 quarters where GDP did go over 3%.....(it was promptly adjusted)
Median Family income Jan 2009 =$54,118 Median family income Oct 2017 =$53, 622
Keep the lies coming spanky
You said " GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months" you f()cking lying piece-of-shit ... now it's 3%? Where's your source for your median income ... with dates. You're right A-hole! I just said there was in fact, ONE MONTH (out of the 32) that GDP was above 3%......ONE! Your fingers get so excited and your brain just doesn't seem to work that fast.......you should slow it down a bit. Psst......where's your (credible....not "Fred's charts and graphs) links for ANY of the crap you spew?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 15:03:59 GMT -5
You said " GDP under 2% for 32 consecutive months" you f()cking lying piece-of-shit ... now it's 3%? Where's your source for your median income ... with dates. You're right A-hole! I just said there was in fact, ONE MONTH (out of the 32) that GDP was above 3%......ONE! Your fingers get so excited and your brain just doesn't seem to work that fast.......you should slow it down a bit. Psst......where's your (credible....not "Fred's charts and graphs) links for ANY of the crap you spew? It's the f()cking FEDERAL RESERVE you moron ... the group of federal banks on which our entire financial system literally is built on. Are you saying you don't trust their data? Here's the official numbers from Census Bureau: "Real median household income in the United States showed a statistically significant increase between the 2014 ACS and the 2015 ACS.5 The 2015 U.S. median household income was $56,516, 6.8 percent higher than the 2014 median (see Table 1). This was the third consecutive year with a statistically significant increase in the national median household income.
www.census.gov/hhes/www/p60_243sa.pdf
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 15:13:00 GMT -5
You're right A-hole! I just said there was in fact, ONE MONTH (out of the 32) that GDP was above 3%......ONE! Your fingers get so excited and your brain just doesn't seem to work that fast.......you should slow it down a bit. Psst......where's your (credible....not "Fred's charts and graphs) links for ANY of the crap you spew? It's the f()cking FEDERAL RESERVE you moron ... the group of federal banks on which our entire financial system literally is built on. Are you saying you don't trust their data? It's still not back to where it was when the incompetent Obama took over on January 20, 2009
What don't you get?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 15:19:40 GMT -5
It's the f()cking FEDERAL RESERVE you moron ... the group of federal banks on which our entire financial system literally is built on. Are you saying you don't trust their data? It's still not back to where it was when the incompetent Obama took over on January 20, 2009
What don't you get?
Again you're f()cking lying !!! Real Median Household Income: Dec 2008 = $55,376 Dec 2015 = $56,516 Which number is bigger spanky ... go ahead, give it a shot.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 15:30:22 GMT -5
It's still not back to where it was when the incompetent Obama took over on January 20, 2009
What don't you get?
Again you're f()cking lying !!! Real Median Household Income: Dec 2008 = $55,376 Dec 2015 = $56,516 Which number is bigger spanky ... go ahead, give it a shot. Absolute 100% lie! (with no link as usual)
The unemployment rate has improved significantly, from 7.8 percent at Obama’s January 20, 2009, inauguration to 5.0 percent in April. However, as more and more Americans stop looking for work, the Labor Force Participation Rate on Obama’s watch has fallen from 65.7 percent to 62.8 percent, a level last measured before Obama in March 1978. Since Obama took office, this metric has slid 4.1 percent. Last month saw the creation of 160,000 jobs, a widely panned number, and much below the 200,000-plus jobs generated in five of the last six months. Nothing about the latest employment report spells “boom.” Obama’s Lackluster Economy Still Lacks Luster Meanwhile, annualized GDP growth nearly stalled in the first quarter at a meager 0.5 percent. This is down from already tepid 1.4 percent growth in the fourth quarter of 2015. Obama is the only U.S. chief executive in history not to preside over even a single year with 3 percent GDP growth, 2015 will have been the tenth year in a row that real GDP growth came in at under 3.0 percent.’ During the Obama years, the number of Americans below the poverty line is up 3.5 percent. Real median household income: down 2.3 percent. Americans on Food Stamps — 33 million then, 46 million now: up 39.5 percent. Americans who own homes: down 5.6 percent. National debt — $10.63 trillion then vs. $19.19 trillion last Wednesday: up 80.5 percent.
www.nationalreview.com/article/435093/barack-obama-economy-jobs-ugly-truth
www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jul/21/donald-trump/donald-trump-largely-right-household-incomes-are-d/
Average Family Today Has Less Income Than When Obama Took Office
www.cnsnews.com/commentary/daniel-mitchell/average-family-today-has-less-income-when-obama-took-office
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 15:50:19 GMT -5
Again you're f()cking lying !!! Real Median Household Income: Dec 2008 = $55,376 Dec 2015 = $56,516 Which number is bigger spanky ... go ahead, give it a shot. Absolute 100% lie! (with no link as usual)
The unemployment rate has improved significantly, from 7.8 percent at Obama’s January 20, 2009, inauguration to 5.0 percent in April. However, as more and more Americans stop looking for work, the Labor Force Participation Rate on Obama’s watch has fallen from 65.7 percent to 62.8 percent, a level last measured before Obama in March 1978. Since Obama took office, this metric has slid 4.1 percent. Last month saw the creation of 160,000 jobs, a widely panned number, and much below the 200,000-plus jobs generated in five of the last six months. Nothing about the latest employment report spells “boom.” Obama’s Lackluster Economy Still Lacks Luster Meanwhile, annualized GDP growth nearly stalled in the first quarter at a meager 0.5 percent. This is down from already tepid 1.4 percent growth in the fourth quarter of 2015. Obama is the only U.S. chief executive in history not to preside over even a single year with 3 percent GDP growth, 2015 will have been the tenth year in a row that real GDP growth came in at under 3.0 percent.’ During the Obama years, the number of Americans below the poverty line is up 3.5 percent. Real median household income: down 2.3 percent. Americans on Food Stamps — 33 million then, 46 million now: up 39.5 percent. Americans who own homes: down 5.6 percent. National debt — $10.63 trillion then vs. $19.19 trillion last Wednesday: up 80.5 percent.
www.nationalreview.com/article/435093/barack-obama-economy-jobs-ugly-truth
www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jul/21/donald-trump/donald-trump-largely-right-household-incomes-are-d/
Average Family Today Has Less Income Than When Obama Took Office
www.cnsnews.com/commentary/daniel-mitchell/average-family-today-has-less-income-when-obama-took-office
My gawd you a f()cking pissant moron. Do I have to repost the same source for the exact same data every time because you're too f()cking stupid to figure it out? Again with the echo chamber bullshit. The national review has no source for their median income number ... none ... nada ... zilch ... which means once again you have you face plastered to their derrieres swallowing whatever unsourced excrement they choose to dump on your chin ... and you say "more please". The Politifact link is comparing numbers from 2000, 9 years before Obama took office ... ya idiot. My gawd you really are a F()CKING MORON !!! I'll say this though ... I keep beating your pointy head around with facts and you keep wallowing in you ignorance just flailing away at anything ... and always proving once again what a F()CKING MORON you are ... at least you are consistent at being an abject imbecile. Keep swallowing that echo chamber bullshit spanky ... you're really good at it ... and you obviously have no self-esteem because having people think that you're a f()cking moron is one thing ... but you are determined to prove it over and over again. Geepers ... You're not even bright enough get in out of the rain.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 16:50:22 GMT -5
Absolute 100% lie! (with no link as usual)
The unemployment rate has improved significantly, from 7.8 percent at Obama’s January 20, 2009, inauguration to 5.0 percent in April. However, as more and more Americans stop looking for work, the Labor Force Participation Rate on Obama’s watch has fallen from 65.7 percent to 62.8 percent, a level last measured before Obama in March 1978. Since Obama took office, this metric has slid 4.1 percent. Last month saw the creation of 160,000 jobs, a widely panned number, and much below the 200,000-plus jobs generated in five of the last six months. Nothing about the latest employment report spells “boom.” Obama’s Lackluster Economy Still Lacks Luster Meanwhile, annualized GDP growth nearly stalled in the first quarter at a meager 0.5 percent. This is down from already tepid 1.4 percent growth in the fourth quarter of 2015. Obama is the only U.S. chief executive in history not to preside over even a single year with 3 percent GDP growth, 2015 will have been the tenth year in a row that real GDP growth came in at under 3.0 percent.’ During the Obama years, the number of Americans below the poverty line is up 3.5 percent. Real median household income: down 2.3 percent. Americans on Food Stamps — 33 million then, 46 million now: up 39.5 percent. Americans who own homes: down 5.6 percent. National debt — $10.63 trillion then vs. $19.19 trillion last Wednesday: up 80.5 percent.
www.nationalreview.com/article/435093/barack-obama-economy-jobs-ugly-truth
www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jul/21/donald-trump/donald-trump-largely-right-household-incomes-are-d/
Average Family Today Has Less Income Than When Obama Took Office
www.cnsnews.com/commentary/daniel-mitchell/average-family-today-has-less-income-when-obama-took-office
My gawd you a f()cking pissant moron. Do I have to repost the same source for the exact same data every time because you're too f()cking stupid to figure it out? Again with the echo chamber bullshit. The national review has no source for their median income number ... none ... nada ... zilch ... which means once again you have you face plastered to their derrieres swallowing whatever unsourced excrement they choose to dump on your chin ... and you say "more please". The Politifact link is comparing numbers from 2000, 9 years before Obama took office ... ya idiot. My gawd you really are a F()CKING MORON !!! I'll say this though ... I keep beating your pointy head around with facts and you keep wallowing in you ignorance just flailing away at anything ... and always proving once again what a F()CKING MORON you are ... at least you are consistent at being an abject imbecile. Keep swallowing that echo chamber bullshit spanky ... you're really good at it ... and you obviously have no self-esteem because having people think that you're a f()cking moron is one thing ... but you are determined to prove it over and over again. Geepers ... You're not even bright enough get in out of the rain. Awwww spanky.......again with no links or facts from you?
I provide link after link, from reliable sources, you got a graph from "Fred's Acme-Links When You Need Em'" and even that dime-store graph proves you wrong, yet again.
I even used one of your fav lie detector sources, politifact, to debunk your lies.
It's gotta be so lonely being you and living in your fantasy bubble. Maybe the vag-heads have room for you? Get a pink vag-hat. Heck, they don't know what the f....k they're protesting about, and you don't know what f....k you're talking about. Sounds like a match made in moonbat heaven.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 17:03:27 GMT -5
My gawd you a f()cking pissant moron. Do I have to repost the same source for the exact same data every time because you're too f()cking stupid to figure it out? Again with the echo chamber bullshit. The national review has no source for their median income number ... none ... nada ... zilch ... which means once again you have you face plastered to their derrieres swallowing whatever unsourced excrement they choose to dump on your chin ... and you say "more please". The Politifact link is comparing numbers from 2000, 9 years before Obama took office ... ya idiot. My gawd you really are a F()CKING MORON !!! I'll say this though ... I keep beating your pointy head around with facts and you keep wallowing in you ignorance just flailing away at anything ... and always proving once again what a F()CKING MORON you are ... at least you are consistent at being an abject imbecile. Keep swallowing that echo chamber bullshit spanky ... you're really good at it ... and you obviously have no self-esteem because having people think that you're a f()cking moron is one thing ... but you are determined to prove it over and over again. Geepers ... You're not even bright enough get in out of the rain. Awwww spanky.......again with no links or facts from you?
I provide link after link, from reliable sources, you got a graph from "Fred's Acme-Links When You Need Em'" and even that dime-store graph proves you wrong, yet again.
I even used one of your fav lie detector sources, politifact, to debunk your lies.
It's gotta be so lonely being you and living in your fantasy bubble. Maybe the vag-heads have room for you? Get a pink vag-hat. Heck, they don't know what the f....k they're protesting about, and you don't know what f....k you're talking about. Sounds like a match made in moonbat heaven.
Last post ... I really can't lower myself to your level of abject ignorance. Hey spanky ... FRED is an acronym for FEDERAL RESERVE ECONOMIC DATA. Literally the bible for economic data used by the entire financial sector in this country. Now F()CK OFF YOU LITTLE PISSANT.
|
|
|
Post by thedonald on Jan 30, 2017 17:11:59 GMT -5
Speaking of fake news,Regarding the Quebec Mosque attack.Did any of you happen to see the Buzz feed reporter ( who also happens to be a Crap News Network contributor) who "reported" the names of two white supremacists that they found on an admitted parody Reuters twitter account.. The MSM ( even in Canada) is so fixated on blaming anything and everything on Trump. They then refused too report the name of the actual shooters until such time that they could slip the name out without many people noticing. The MSM is also refusing to report that the shooter yelled "Allahu Akbar" before opening fire.
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 17:19:00 GMT -5
Awwww spanky.......again with no links or facts from you?
I provide link after link, from reliable sources, you got a graph from "Fred's Acme-Links When You Need Em'" and even that dime-store graph proves you wrong, yet again.
I even used one of your fav lie detector sources, politifact, to debunk your lies.
It's gotta be so lonely being you and living in your fantasy bubble. Maybe the vag-heads have room for you? Get a pink vag-hat. Heck, they don't know what the f....k they're protesting about, and you don't know what f....k you're talking about. Sounds like a match made in moonbat heaven.
Last post ... I really can't lower myself to your level of abject ignorance. Hey spanky ... FRED is an acronym for FEDERAL RESERVE ECONOMIC DATA. Literally the bible for economic data used by the entire financial sector in this country. Now F()CK OFF YOU LITTLE PISSANT. LOL! CBO, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau.........they got nothing, right? You're so dumb it's scary.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 17:35:01 GMT -5
Last post ... I really can't lower myself to your level of abject ignorance. Hey spanky ... FRED is an acronym for FEDERAL RESERVE ECONOMIC DATA. Literally the bible for economic data used by the entire financial sector in this country. Now F()CK OFF YOU LITTLE PISSANT. LOL! CBO, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau.........they got nothing, right? You're so dumb it's scary. Hey moron ... you didn't post any of those sources ... now did you. So why are you trying to say you did. Are you just trying to prove what a F()CKING POS LIAR you are ... again?
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 17:41:22 GMT -5
LOL! CBO, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau.........they got nothing, right? You're so dumb it's scary. Hey moron ... you didn't post any of those sources ... now did you. So why are you trying to say you did. Are you just trying to prove what a F()CKING POS LIAR you are ... again? Read the links stupid. Read their sources.
This is like arguing with a 2-yr-old.
Didn't you say ' last post'?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 17:45:45 GMT -5
Hey moron ... you didn't post any of those sources ... now did you. So why are you trying to say you did. Are you just trying to prove what a F()CKING POS LIAR you are ... again? Read the links stupid. Read their sources.
This is like arguing with a 2-yr-old.
Didn't you say ' last post'?
I did ... and not single .gov address in the bunch. BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You're a POS F()CKING LIAR WHO CAN"T GET A REAL JOB. LOSER !!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Jan 30, 2017 19:03:58 GMT -5
Read the links stupid. Read their sources.
This is like arguing with a 2-yr-old.
Didn't you say ' last post'?
I did ... and not single .gov address in the bunch. BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You're a POS F()CKING LIAR WHO CAN"T GET A REAL JOB. LOSER !!!!!! Say goodnight you drug addled drunk
|
|
|
Post by Mimi on Jan 30, 2017 20:33:46 GMT -5
Alright......enough is enough boys.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Jan 30, 2017 21:30:48 GMT -5
Reminds me of the old days at BDC.
|
|
|
Fake News
Jan 30, 2017 21:50:26 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by thedonald on Jan 30, 2017 21:50:26 GMT -5
Reminds me of the old days at BDC. You know what they say, the more things change the more they stay the same.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2017 22:55:04 GMT -5
I did ... and not single .gov address in the bunch. BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You're a POS F()CKING LIAR WHO CAN"T GET A REAL JOB. LOSER !!!!!! Say goodnight you drug addled drunk
If I was drunk at least I'd sober up by morning ... but you will always wake up as a freaking lying, ignorant loser who can't get a decent job.
|
|
|
Fake News
Jan 31, 2017 1:29:05 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by thebabestrikesback on Jan 31, 2017 1:29:05 GMT -5
Read the links stupid. Read their sources.
This is like arguing with a 2-yr-old.
Didn't you say ' last post'?
I did ... and not single .gov address in the bunch. BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You're a POS F()CKING LIAR WHO CAN"T GET A REAL JOB. LOSER !!!!!! So, according to you, if your job doesn't cover your health insurance it's not a "real" job?
|
|
|
Fake News
Jan 31, 2017 2:21:08 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by thedonald on Jan 31, 2017 2:21:08 GMT -5
You know what they say, the more things change the more they stay the same. Welcome to the new forum, thedonald. As for,"...the more they stay the same.", well not always for the better, yes? As you can/will see, some things are similar to the old BDC, and some things are really quite different. Thanks, it ought to be quite the show just like it has been on Twitter lately. Lol
|
|
|
Fake News
Jan 31, 2017 2:22:59 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by thedonald on Jan 31, 2017 2:22:59 GMT -5
I did ... and not single .gov address in the bunch. BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA You're a POS F()CKING LIAR WHO CAN"T GET A REAL JOB. LOSER !!!!!! So, according to you, if your job doesn't cover your health insurance it's not a "real" job? Even when you get a new job with benefits you have to be there 3-6 months before you get them
|
|