Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020
Guest
|
Post by Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020 on Aug 24, 2020 8:45:33 GMT -5
Thank you mate. Sorry I took the honor from you. Still awaiting any rebuttal you have on mail in voting or collusion. I see you are good at name calling but you have nothing to say. Note 200,000 mail in votes were found in Nevada sent to wrong address dead people moved people. Some came back some stolen many missing. I am sure a mutt like you believes that is fine right? No problem? Defund the Police Bro! Your post began with the sentence "Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction". Yet you don't understand what's meant by "Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction", saying "I have no idea why Mueller has an opinion on obstruction". You still can't, or won't, explain it. And you posted it. If you're going to cut and paste, be certain you understand what is contained therein. Otherwise you throw your ignorance into sharp relief. You continue to have a problem with collusion verses obstruction. 3 investigations proved there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. Not real difficult to understand mate. Given your lack of understanding that 70 to 80 million ballots being sent out randomly without verification or scrutiny will result in massive fraud cheating and stealing I am not surprised at all. You are not too bright are you mate?
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 24, 2020 8:53:27 GMT -5
Congratulations, in mere days you've managed to firmly establish yourself as possibly the dumbest poster to ever grace this forum! Too bad Community Organizer isn't here to see this, he'd be so relieved to be relieved of such a position. Not a Boomer, BTW. Nor am I a "mongrel" for that matter. Look, if you're going to craft an insult, you might want it to have some sort of bearing on the intended victim..... otherwise it falls flat. Learn to read the room, @sshat. As far as obstruction goes do you mean obstruction like Bleech Bit erasing 30,000 emails? Blackberry and laptops being sledge hammered? Or do you mean FBI lawyers and agents criminally changing paperwork texts and emails? Uhm.... we were talking about your post about possible Russian collusion and the reason why exoneration was take off the table. That's what you posted, "Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction". But now you can't adequately defend the post that you made... so you're switching to Clinton? WTF, man? Really?
|
|
Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020
Guest
|
Post by Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020 on Aug 24, 2020 9:10:39 GMT -5
As far as obstruction goes do you mean obstruction like Bleech Bit erasing 30,000 emails? Blackberry and laptops being sledge hammered? Or do you mean FBI lawyers and agents criminally changing paperwork texts and emails? Uhm.... we were talking about your post about possible Russian collusion and the reason why exoneration was take off the table. That's what you posted, "Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction". But now you can't adequately defend the post that you made... so you're switching to Clinton? WTF, man? Really? No go back and look. Conversation was about collusion and the 3 costly investigations that all determined no collusion. One of those in the opinion title from the article said but cant exonerate on obstruction. Big deal! What is your point Boomer?
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 24, 2020 9:21:43 GMT -5
Uhm.... we were talking about your post about possible Russian collusion and the reason why exoneration was take off the table. That's what you posted, "Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction". But now you can't adequately defend the post that you made... so you're switching to Clinton? WTF, man? Really? No go back and look. Conversation was about collusion and the 3 costly investigations that all determined no collusion. One of those in the opinion title from the article said but cant exonerate on obstruction. Big deal! What is your point Boomer? You do know what obstruction is, right? How and why it's used?
|
|
Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020
Guest
|
Post by Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020 on Aug 24, 2020 10:49:56 GMT -5
No go back and look. Conversation was about collusion and the 3 costly investigations that all determined no collusion. One of those in the opinion title from the article said but cant exonerate on obstruction. Big deal! What is your point Boomer? You do know what obstruction is, right? How and why it's used? Oh I know Boomer. You do know what collusion is right? Defund the Police Bro
|
|
Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020
Guest
|
Post by Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020 on Aug 24, 2020 11:26:39 GMT -5
No go back and look. Conversation was about collusion and the 3 costly investigations that all determined no collusion. One of those in the opinion title from the article said but cant exonerate on obstruction. Big deal! What is your point Boomer? You do know what obstruction is, right? How and why it's used? From the Mueller investigation report and testimony-- 'Mueller refrained from recommending prosecution, saying that there were “difficult legal issues that would need to be resolved,” in order to reach a conclusion that the crime of obstruction of justice was committed by Trump. “Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct,” Mueller wrote.' Seems that Mueller realised obstruction was speculation and opinion that would not stick. It is Okay boomer I wont embarrass you any more.
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 24, 2020 11:56:36 GMT -5
You do know what obstruction is, right? How and why it's used? From the Mueller investigation report and testimony-- 'Mueller refrained from recommending prosecution, saying that there were “difficult legal issues that would need to be resolved,” in order to reach a conclusion that the crime of obstruction of justice was committed by Trump. “Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct,” Mueller wrote.' Seems that Mueller realised obstruction was speculation and opinion that would not stick. It is Okay boomer I wont embarrass you any more. Yeah, "4X?" pretty much summed it up for ya...... "because the DoJ had issued a directive that a sitting PotUS cannot be indicted while in office. And then there's this.... Mueller stated that one of the goals of the probe was to "preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials available," because "a President does not have immunity after he leaves office." But still though, you can't, or won't, answer the question..... what is obstruction, and how and why is it used? Still not a Boomer; totally not embarrassed.
|
|
Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020
Guest
|
Post by Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020 on Aug 24, 2020 12:11:31 GMT -5
From the Mueller investigation report and testimony-- 'Mueller refrained from recommending prosecution, saying that there were “difficult legal issues that would need to be resolved,” in order to reach a conclusion that the crime of obstruction of justice was committed by Trump. “Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President’s conduct,” Mueller wrote.' Seems that Mueller realised obstruction was speculation and opinion that would not stick. It is Okay boomer I wont embarrass you any more. Yeah, "4X?" pretty much summed it up for ya...... "because the DoJ had issued a directive that a sitting PotUS cannot be indicted while in office. And then there's this.... Mueller stated that one of the goals of the probe was to "preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials available," because "a President does not have immunity after he leaves office." But still though, you can't, or won't, answer the question..... what is obstruction, and how and why is it used? Still not a Boomer; totally not embarrassed. Is there a reason you think I should be answering questions for you? You have not answered anything. You have not said anything. Is this how you operate around here like you are above the discussion? What is collusion Boomer? It is Okay you will not be embarrassed
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 24, 2020 12:27:00 GMT -5
Yeah, "4X?" pretty much summed it up for ya...... "because the DoJ had issued a directive that a sitting PotUS cannot be indicted while in office. And then there's this.... Mueller stated that one of the goals of the probe was to "preserve the evidence when memories were fresh and documentary materials available," because "a President does not have immunity after he leaves office." But still though, you can't, or won't, answer the question..... what is obstruction, and how and why is it used? Still not a Boomer; totally not embarrassed. Is there a reason you think I should be answering questions for you? You have not answered anything. You have not said anything. Is this how you operate around here like you are above the discussion? What is collusion Boomer? It is Okay you will not be embarrassed You should be able to answer it because you included it in your post, right? "Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction" And I'm curious, after these 3 "costly" investigations that say there was "no collusion", I have to wonder what your "thoughts" are on the numerous very costly investigations into Hillary Clinton. She's the most exonerated politician ever! I wasn't going to mention it when you brought it up, but you did...... so..... thoughts?
|
|
Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020
Guest
|
Post by Sleepy Joe/ Sloppy Hoe 2020 on Aug 24, 2020 13:29:41 GMT -5
Is there a reason you think I should be answering questions for you? You have not answered anything. You have not said anything. Is this how you operate around here like you are above the discussion? What is collusion Boomer? It is Okay you will not be embarrassed You should be able to answer it because you included it in your post, right? "Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction" And I'm curious, after these 3 "costly" investigations that say there was "no collusion", I have to wonder what your "thoughts" are on the numerous very costly investigations into Hillary Clinton. She's the most exonerated politician ever! I wasn't going to mention it when you brought it up, but you did...... so..... thoughts? Again with questions and no answers? I think we are done here. Ok Boomer For the record who cares if Mueller can't exonerate on obstruction. It was not up to him. He was to investigate and file a report. Three investigations all proved there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. That will not change no matter how much you cry. bye bye mutt
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 24, 2020 13:40:35 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... You just gotta laugh at the tRumpswabbers around here ... their lack of critical thinking is astounding. So the Traitor-in-Chief obstructs the investigation and then turns around and claims vindication by an investigation that he never allowed to happen. And the tRumpswabbers swallow the Traitor-in-Chief's bullshiit and turn around and regurgitate the 'vindication' lie all over these boards while completely ignoring the obstruction. The cult of personality strikes again .... And they think they're moving the goalposts while what they're actually doing is widening the goal, making themselves even more vulnerable. They continue to paint themselves into corners. It's not even fun anymore... too easy. And this new kid..... boring af.
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 24, 2020 13:51:21 GMT -5
New kid same as the old kid Commie? Never thought of him as a kid.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Aug 24, 2020 16:17:00 GMT -5
A sleepy sloppy commie hoe? It fits.
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 24, 2020 16:45:25 GMT -5
A sleepy sloppy commie hoe? It fits. Nah, this new kid is something else. Terrible at writing. Like a struggling high school student at best. Totally afraid of contractions; he can read and understand them, but when faced with using them he freezes up and goes long form. Or he thinks it sounds more sophisticated and mature, but it doesn't because the prose becomes clunky and people don't talk like that. Either way, it's just poor. Then there's the lack of commas, I don't think I've noticed any now that I think of it. All together it results in difficult to read posts. I don't think he's a Millennial, most likely Gen-Z. If Commie had a son, this could be him.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Aug 24, 2020 16:59:11 GMT -5
Well sloppy hoe does like to say OK Boomer a lot so he quickly latches on to last months over-used gen-z drift like he's just discovered something original. *Yawn*
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Aug 24, 2020 22:25:35 GMT -5
Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr wrote in a letter to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on Sunday afternoon. That was despite "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign," he wrote. www.npr.org/2019/03/24/706318191/trump-white-house-hasnt-seen-or-been-briefed-on-mueller-investigation-reportNo collusion in 2016 between Trump campaign and Russia: Senate Intelligence Committee report The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 presidential election. The fifth and final volume of the panel’s report on Russian meddling in the 2016 election largely mirrored the conclusions of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe, which also failed to show a Trump-Russia conspiracy. www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/aug/18/senate-intelligence-cmte-no-collusion-trump-russia/Inspector General's Report On The Russia Investigation understand that's, no one's collaborating, there's been no collusion apps.npr.org/documents/document.html?id=6571534-OIG-Russia-Investigation-ReportWhere are the posts moving to now boomer? I'm wondering why you won't explain why the Mueller Report "can't Exonerate On Obstruction". It's right there in your post..... what do you think it means? This is an easy question. You would have to be a moron beyond belief to not understand. It’s an easy answer. Investigations are supposed to uncover facts and present them, they’re not supposed exonerate anyone. That’s not their job. There wasn’t enough evidence to find any crimes so they couldn’t recommend that further legal action take place. In other words, the obstruction thing was a political hit job with no basis in legality.
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 25, 2020 8:13:28 GMT -5
I'm wondering why you won't explain why the Mueller Report "can't Exonerate On Obstruction". It's right there in your post..... what do you think it means? This is an easy question. You would have to be a moron beyond belief to not understand. It’s an easy answer. Investigations are supposed to uncover facts and present them, they’re not supposed exonerate anyone. That’s not their job. There wasn’t enough evidence to find any crimes so they couldn’t recommend that further legal action take place. In other words, the obstruction thing was a political hit job with no basis in legality. So, according to you.... "no collusion" isn't exoneration?
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Aug 25, 2020 10:28:40 GMT -5
It’s an easy answer. Investigations are supposed to uncover facts and present them, they’re not supposed exonerate anyone. That’s not their job. There wasn’t enough evidence to find any crimes so they couldn’t recommend that further legal action take place. In other words, the obstruction thing was a political hit job with no basis in legality. So, according to you.... "no collusion" isn't exoneration? If it can't be proved it's exoneration. Same as in a jury trial, a "not guilty" conclusion, while not the same thing as innocent, is still an exoneration. Juries don't come back with "well we didn't find that there was enough proof to find this person guilty but we still think he's guilty." That the Mueller team did this is a travesty of our justice system and proof of how corrupt elements of it has become.
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Aug 25, 2020 16:43:13 GMT -5
HRC was exonerated five times over but the gopers still want to lock her up and call her crooked Hillary though somehow Flynn is a hero despite admission of guilt and trump is still doddering around the white house after pretty much running the nation into the ground. What a world!! MAGA.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Aug 27, 2020 7:33:40 GMT -5
HRC was exonerated five times over but the gopers still want to lock her up and call her crooked Hillary though somehow Flynn is a hero despite admission of guilt and trump is still doddering around the white house after pretty much running the nation into the ground. What a world!! MAGA. When the opposing team investigates you and can’t find anything that’s as close to exhilaration that you can get. When your own team investigates you and they find plenty but declines to prosecute then you know that justice has been rigged.
|
|
|
Post by ALGERNON on Aug 27, 2020 12:20:27 GMT -5
HRC was exonerated five times over but the gopers still want to lock her up and call her crooked Hillary though somehow Flynn is a hero despite admission of guilt and trump is still doddering around the white house after pretty much running the nation into the ground. What a world!! MAGA. When the opposing team investigates you and can’t find anything that’s as close to exhilaration that you can get. When your own team investigates you and they find plenty but declines to prosecute then you know that justice has been rigged.\ Unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Sept 3, 2020 14:59:29 GMT -5
Don't worry about it Angry, we all agree that the voting process is secure and there can't be any cheating.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 7, 2020 6:23:33 GMT -5
Two notorious conservative operatives were charged Thursday with felonies in connection with false robocalls that aimed to dissuade residents in Detroit and other U.S. cities from voting by mail, Michigan's attorney general announced.
Jacob Wohl, 22, and Jack Burkman, 54, each face four felony counts in Detroit, including conspiring to intimidate voters in violation of election law and using a computer to commit crimes, Attorney General Dana Nessel said.
Both of those guys are jackwagons.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 9, 2020 7:26:38 GMT -5
But they're your jackwagons, StalkingButtkisser which proves that the system isn't corrupt it's you and your disgusting ilk who are corrupt. Jackwagons are jaskwagons, I don't associate myself with any of them. I've noticed that you haven't posted any of the several vote related arrests that have happened in the last few days that committed by Democrats and their supporters. Why is that?
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Oct 9, 2020 9:38:52 GMT -5
Here's a thought. Maybe you should post them and any details. Use a valid news source.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 9, 2020 9:52:28 GMT -5
"thought"
It's almost as if you guys don't care if the election is fraudulent as long as your guy wins. That CAN'T be true, right?
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Oct 9, 2020 11:46:09 GMT -5
So nothing?
I might vote for your guy if he wasn't such a miserable failure as a president and a human being.
You'll vote for a miserable failure of a president an human being as long as it's your guy.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 9, 2020 12:04:55 GMT -5
So nothing? I might vote for your guy if he wasn't such a miserable failure as a president and a human being. You'll vote for a miserable failure of a president an human being as long as it's your guy. He's been quite successful unless you think that COVID19 is his fault in which case your kind of an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Oct 9, 2020 12:32:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Speed Racer on Oct 9, 2020 12:37:25 GMT -5
Ya can't debate a wing nut. They're just not that bright. It's why we are where we are now.
|
|