Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 18:45:48 GMT -5
The gist of the statement, since you failed to get it was that I should lay down and accept him and my president. My response was I will not. Now that I had to explain the subject for you I will continue. If you wingnuts want to lay over and accept a megalomaniac, racist, moronic blowhard as president, have at it. I won't, seems you do. Trump will never have my support. That's all you need to know. You can expect I will never support him in any vote, or anything that involves him. Now go ahead and twist my words, move goalposts and make your assumptions as usual. So you’ve done nothing. You ‘not surrendering’ has had zero impact. You’re all talk as usual. Got it. Yep all talk, zero impact and no surrender. Now go play outside or do your homework.
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 18, 2017 19:04:36 GMT -5
So you’ve done nothing. You ‘not surrendering’ has had zero impact. You’re all talk as usual. Got it. Yep all talk, zero impact and no surrender. Now go play outside or do your homework. So you agree you’ve made zero impact. Glad we cleared that up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 19:25:16 GMT -5
I didn't realize every action must be immediately quantifiable ... sounds pretty damn ignorant ... for any number of reasons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 19:26:37 GMT -5
So wingnuts were saying 'he's not my president' for no reason and without cause? Heh, heh, heh ... That's even more stupid and ignorant than the lies and tinfoil hatter conspiracy theories ... but either way it's still a false equivalency. Four people from the Racist-in-Chief's admin/campaign have already been indicted and the investigation continues with evidence mounting of a corrupt administration. And then there's the fact that the Racist-in-Chief has offered aid and comfort to nazis ... who at one time were our most hated enemies. Apparently the wingnuts have gotten over the whole WW2/Jewish extermination thingy and now think there are some 'good nazis' in the country. Go figure. You really are a dink. I don’t know everyone’s reason for not wanting to support Obama. I just know they were scolded for doing so by the pompous hypocritical asshats liberals on the old BDC site. So let me get this straight ... you're trying to make a comparison between two things you know nothing about. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!! You really are a friggin moron.
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 18, 2017 19:30:02 GMT -5
You really are a dink. I don’t know everyone’s reason for not wanting to support Obama. I just know they were scolded for doing so by the pompous hypocritical asshats liberals on the old BDC site. So let me get this straight ... you're trying to make a comparison between two things you know nothing about. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!! You really are a friggin moron. Christ you are unreal. The point is it wasn’t ok to not support/recognize the president...but NOW it is ok. That’s called hypocrisy....something you are quite familiar with.
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 18, 2017 19:31:06 GMT -5
I didn't realize every action must be immediately quantifiable ... sounds pretty damn ignorant ... for any number of reasons. Otherwise it’s just talk. Again...something you’re quite familiar with
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 19:36:13 GMT -5
Yep all talk, zero impact and no surrender. Now go play outside or do your homework. So you agree you’ve made zero impact. Glad we cleared that up. Good, glad we cleared that up for the narcissistic assclown that's terrified to ever take a stand on anything. Now, lay back down. that's a g'boy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 19:41:07 GMT -5
So let me get this straight ... you're trying to make a comparison between two things you know nothing about. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!! You really are a friggin moron. Christ you are unreal. The point is it wasn’t ok to not support/recognize the president...but NOW it is ok. That’s called hypocrisy....something you are quite familiar with. Hey moron ... if you can't refute the fact that they are incomparable, then you're trying to introduce a false equivalency ... which means it's just you blowing smoke up your own a55. False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.
There is no moral obligation for citizens to support a corrupt administration.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 19:44:17 GMT -5
I didn't realize every action must be immediately quantifiable ... sounds pretty damn ignorant ... for any number of reasons. Otherwise it’s just talk. Again...something you’re quite familiar with Tell me something a55hat ... if a cop talks with some inner city kids to try and win their trust and show cops aren't to be feared ... what's the quantifiable result? The more you post, the more you prove that you're an ignorant buffoon who's too freaking stupid to come in out of a rain storm.
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 18, 2017 19:50:21 GMT -5
Christ you are unreal. The point is it wasn’t ok to not support/recognize the president...but NOW it is ok. That’s called hypocrisy....something you are quite familiar with. Hey moron ... if you can't refute the fact that they are incomparable, then you're trying to introduce a false equivalency ... which means it's just you blowing smoke up your own a55. False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.
There is no moral obligation for citizens to support a corrupt administration. There is no obligation for anyone to support any president. This is a free country where people can CHOOSE whether or not they want to support a president. There is no requirement that the president has to be corrupt in order to not support him.
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 18, 2017 19:53:53 GMT -5
Otherwise it’s just talk. Again...something you’re quite familiar with Tell me something a55hat ... if a cop talks with some inner city kids to try and win their trust and show cops aren't to be feared ... what's the quantifiable result? The more you post, the more you prove that you're an ignorant buffoon who's too freaking stupid to have a conversation with. The quantifiable results in your hypothetical situation is that some of the kids will end up connecting with the cop. In billtheego’s case he is all talk. But you know that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 20:00:50 GMT -5
Hey moron ... if you can't refute the fact that they are incomparable, then you're trying to introduce a false equivalency ... which means it's just you blowing smoke up your own a55. False equivalence
False equivalence is a logical fallacy which describes a situation where there is a logical and apparent equivalence, but when in fact there is none. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.
There is no moral obligation for citizens to support a corrupt administration. There is no obligation for anyone to support any president. This is a free country where people can CHOOSE whether or not they want to support a president. There is no requirement that the president has to be corrupt in order to not support him. WTF ? Again with moving the goalposts and flip flopping like a freaking bait fish. You affirmed Buttkisser's post that not supporting a PotUS is akin to treason. Now you're saying that not only is there no 'moral obligation' to support a PotUS ... you're saying that there's no obligation at all. So how the fvck do you square that circle? You expanded on SB's post that not supporting a PotUS equates to treason ... a serious crime punishable by death ... by making the false equivalence with the prior admin and now you're saying that it's no big deal, just brush it off ... everyone has a 'free speech' right to commit treason. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 20:03:45 GMT -5
Tell me something a55hat ... if a cop talks with some inner city kids to try and win their trust and show cops aren't to be feared ... what's the quantifiable result? The more you post, the more you prove that you're an ignorant buffoon who's too freaking stupid to have a conversation with. The quantifiable results in your hypothetical situation is that some of the kids will end up connecting with the cop. In billtheego’s case he is all talk. But you know that. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I forgot ... you dipsticks just 'know' stuff ... actual, quantifiable evidence is not required. How do you 'know' ... as opposed to 'think' or 'hope' ... that any of those kids will connect with a cop? How do you know that Bill's talk won't persuade someone to change their mind?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2017 20:15:17 GMT -5
I'll talk, vote, be active in the community and work to fight trump any way possible, remedy prefers to give up, lay down, and take it...all. I think I prefer my way.
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 19, 2017 8:46:34 GMT -5
There is no obligation for anyone to support any president. This is a free country where people can CHOOSE whether or not they want to support a president. There is no requirement that the president has to be corrupt in order to not support him. WTF ? Again with moving the goalposts and flip flopping like a freaking bait fish. You affirmed Buttkisser's post that not supporting a PotUS is akin to treason. Now you're saying that not only is there no 'moral obligation' to support a PotUS ... you're saying that there's no obligation at all. So how the fvck do you square that circle? You expanded on SB's post that not supporting a PotUS equates to treason ... a serious crime punishable by death ... by making the false equivalence with the prior admin and now you're saying that it's no big deal, just brush it off ... everyone has a 'free speech' right to commit treason. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !!!!!! Are you drunk? Please show me where I affirmed not supporting a POTIS is akin to treason. I can’t wait to see you try to spin this one. I simply replied to Stalkings post with MY thoughts. What Stalking posted is HIS thought. See how that works?
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 19, 2017 8:51:29 GMT -5
The quantifiable results in your hypothetical situation is that some of the kids will end up connecting with the cop. In billtheego’s case he is all talk. But you know that. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I forgot ... you dipsticks just 'know' stuff ... actual, quantifiable evidence is not required. How do you 'know' ... as opposed to 'think' or 'hope' ... that any of those kids will connect with a cop? How do you know that Bill's talk won't persuade someone to change their mind? How do you know the kids, in your HYPOTHETICAL situation, won’t? How do I know Bill’s talk won’t persuade someone to change their mind? Has a hardcore Righty ever persuaded you to change your mind to their way of thinking? I suspect not since you think, based on what you post here about them, that conservatives are morons.
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 19, 2017 8:55:21 GMT -5
I'll talk, vote, be active in the community and work to fight trump any way possible, remedy prefers to give up, lay down, and take it...all. I think I prefer my way. You mean you’ll vote for Dems? Boy....what a change from what you normally would do...hahaha. You aren’t doing anything that ‘fight’ Trump and you know that...unless of course you’re a senator or congressman voting against his proposals. Are you a senator or congressman? Do tell.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Dec 19, 2017 9:06:30 GMT -5
Who does this remind you of?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 10:56:59 GMT -5
I'll talk, vote, be active in the community and work to fight trump any way possible, remedy prefers to give up, lay down, and take it...all. I think I prefer my way. You mean you’ll vote for Dems? Boy....what a change from what you normally would do...hahaha. You aren’t doing anything that ‘fight’ Trump and you know that...unless of course you’re a senator or congressman voting against his proposals. Are you a senator or congressman? Do tell. Are you laughing at your own stupidity? Let me try to unpack this for you...again. So no, I vote against people who can damage America. If they are Dems, then I'll vote for them, if they're Republicans, I'll vote for them. There just havent been a whole lot of republicans lately worth voting for. And Trump is the biggest danger to America that's come along in a long time. Is that my fault? There are many things you can do on a local level to protest the manchild-in-chiefs misguided policies. But you don't know this because you prefer to acquiesce and appease the status quo like a good little mindless party member toadie.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Dec 19, 2017 11:20:39 GMT -5
Who does this remind you of? Resist!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 11:59:29 GMT -5
Yes, we don't want empty promises and hollow tweets sent while sitting on the toilet. Republicans may live on that BS but Dems and really any empathetic citizens continually ask "Where's the beef"?
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Dec 19, 2017 12:30:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Donald J Putin on Dec 19, 2017 12:52:44 GMT -5
A lot of those are meaningless. Deregulation can be good, BUT it can lead to major major problems like savings and loans crisis and major meltdowns. The republican way is sacrifice the future to get instant gratification so people like you and the Village Idiot can go see see things are great, all the while massive deficits are brewing, major crises are beginning, and then BOOM the country is left much worse off with even bigger deficits. At which point a democrat takes over and you try to blame all the problems on him and complain about the deficits... This pretty much sums up the past 16 years.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Dec 19, 2017 12:58:30 GMT -5
That's hilarious. Can you imagine the number of man hours and cost that each one of these regulations just to develop?
But then again in Washington that's probably a feature, not a problem. There's a reason the the DC area is the wealthiest in the nation.
|
|
|
Post by Donald J Putin on Dec 19, 2017 12:59:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Dec 19, 2017 13:05:05 GMT -5
Krugman. The guy that had to have his comments turned of at the online NYT site because he was getting schooled by his commenters. pjmedia.com/instapundit/282159/PAUL KRUGMAN ON ELECTION NIGHT: “If the question is when markets will recover, a first-pass answer is never.”
CNBC, just now: Dow rips 331 points higher, closes above 24,000 as chances of Senate tax bill passing rise. “The Dow Jones industrial average surged 331.67 points to close above 24,000 for the first time, with United Technologies leading advancers on the 30-stock index. The S&P 500 advanced 0.8 percent to close at 2,647.58 — an all-time high — with industrials and information technology among the best-performing sectors.”
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 13:21:45 GMT -5
That's hilarious. Can you imagine the number of man hours and cost that each one of these regulations just to develop? But then again in Washington that's probably a feature, not a problem. There's a reason the the DC area is the wealthiest in the nation. You should take a trip down there sometime. Except for Georgetown and some tourist pockets, D.C. area is far from wealthy.
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Dec 19, 2017 13:33:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by theremedy on Dec 19, 2017 13:40:57 GMT -5
You mean you’ll vote for Dems? Boy....what a change from what you normally would do...hahaha. You aren’t doing anything that ‘fight’ Trump and you know that...unless of course you’re a senator or congressman voting against his proposals. Are you a senator or congressman? Do tell. Are you laughing at your own stupidity? Let me try to unpack this for you...again. So no, I vote against people who can damage America. If they are Dems, then I'll vote for them, if they're Republicans, I'll vote for them. There just havent been a whole lot of republicans lately worth voting for. And Trump is the biggest danger to America that's come along in a long time. Is that my fault? There are many things you can do on a local level to protest the manchild-in-chiefs misguided policies. But you don't know this because you prefer to acquiesce and appease the status quo like a good little mindless party member toadie. Stop your lying. You aren’t doing sh!t. You’re all talk.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 19, 2017 13:51:00 GMT -5
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa I forgot ... you dipsticks just 'know' stuff ... actual, quantifiable evidence is not required. How do you 'know' ... as opposed to 'think' or 'hope' ... that any of those kids will connect with a cop? How do you know that Bill's talk won't persuade someone to change their mind? How do you know the kids, in your HYPOTHETICAL situation, won’t? How do I know Bill’s talk won’t persuade someone to change their mind? Has a hardcore Righty ever persuaded you to change your mind to their way of thinking? I suspect not since you think, based on what you post here about them, that conservatives are morons. Again with your ass backward ignorance ... you really are a freaking moron. Do you not understand logical arguments? Are you too freaking stupid to make a logical argument ... instead of your stupid fallacies? You're the idiot who insisted Bill quantify his effects ... and when confronted with an identical situation about talking to people, you blurted out that it would work. So once again you've proven to be a pos anklebiting liar and a hypocrite. You know that engaging people produces results ... you said so with the kids ... but then you say the opposite when Bill takes the same approach. Just fvck off already ... once again you've proven to be a waste of time and nothing but a narcissist looking for attention.
|
|