Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 11:18:14 GMT -5
According to the New York Observer ... which is owned by the Angry Cheeto’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. The entire Intel community is so concerned that they are withholding sensitive information from the White House for the first time in history because they believe that Russia will find out anything they tell the Angry Cheeto and his aides. In less than a month the Angry Cheeto and his administration has proven to be such a clusterF*ck of a disaster that not only doesn't our own intelligence agencies trust it ... our allies are also backtracking from sharing intel. Who needs wikileaks ... the Angry Cheeto is cutting out the middle man ... SB must be sooo proud. The Spy Revolt Against Trump Begins
Intelligence Community pushes back against a White House it considers leaky, untruthful and penetrated by the Kremlin.
In a recent column, I explained how the still-forming Trump administration is already doing serious harm to America’s longstanding global intelligence partnerships. In particular, fears that the White House is too friendly to Moscow are causing close allies to curtail some of their espionage relationships with Washington—a development with grave implications for international security, particularly in the all-important realm of counterterrorism.
Now those concerns are causing problems much closer to home—in fact, inside the Beltway itself. Our Intelligence Community is so worried by the unprecedented problems of the Trump administration—not only do senior officials possess troubling ties to the Kremlin, there are nagging questions about basic competence regarding Team Trump—that it is beginning to withhold intelligence from a White House which our spies do not trust.
That the IC has ample grounds for concern is demonstrated by almost daily revelations of major problems inside the White House, a mere three weeks after the inauguration. The president has repeatedly gone out of his way to antagonize our spies, mocking them and demeaning their work, and Trump’s personal national security guru can’t seem to keep his story straight on vital issues. |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 13, 2017 11:23:06 GMT -5
They should all be fired immediately.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 11:27:48 GMT -5
They should all be fired immediately. For what ... refusing to commit ... or knowingly help others commit ... espionage against their own country? For upholding their oath to the Constitution? For putting the safety and security of the country first and foremost? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 11:50:37 GMT -5
They should all be fired immediately. It's telling that your first response isn't along the lines of "Those are serious charges made by our professional intelligence community and should be investigated". No-sir-ee ... your response is that they all should be replaced with yes-men loyal to a person rather than their oath to the Constitution ... "Political Party Uber Alles!" Kinda defeats the whole purpose of having an oath of office. Obviously you think we should be more like a third world, banana republic with allegiance to a dictator rather than our founding documents. "Disgusting ilk" indeed ... |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 12:01:07 GMT -5
"Those are serious charges made by our professional intelligence community and should be investigated".
LOL! The very same "professional intelligence community" that chased down the goldenshower? Or 55,000 missing emails? 13 sledgehammered blackberrys?
THEY SHOULD ALL BE FIRED IMMEDIATELY!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 12:13:03 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... the loyal lemmings are falling in line as predicted. Only a F*cking moron goes foam-at-the-mouth berserk just because they don't like the conclusions of our top intel professionals. Classic head-up-their-ass syndrome: "If the evidence based conclusions of professionals don't align with my ignorant ideology then the facts are wrong!" ![]()  |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 12:39:54 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... the loyal lemmings are falling in line as predicted. Only a F*cking moron goes foam-at-the-mouth berserk just because they don't like the conclusions of our top intel professionals. Classic head-up-their-ass syndrome: "If the evidence based conclusions of professionals don't align with my ignorant ideology then the facts are wrong!" ![]() You must be right, I'm sure.
When is the impeachment coming for those "pee-sessions?" Or election results being manipulated by the "evil Russians"?
Idiot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 12:52:15 GMT -5
Obviously the resident moron doesn't realize that; A) the US intel community didn't create the piss dossier on the Angry Cheeto and B) that there is a broad consensus among all the intel agencies that Russia did hack private accounts and did disseminate that info to influence the election.
But hey ... don't let the facts get in the way of shoving your head up your ass ... you're obviously intent on maintaining that position, so no amount of reality will dissuade you.
Carry on spanky ... and keep spouting ignorance ... it only proves the point that idiots like you have no business second guessing our country's professional intel community.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 12:55:14 GMT -5
Obviously the resident moron doesn't realize that the intel community didn't create the piss dossier on the Angry Cheeto ... or that there is a consensus among all the intel agencies that Russia did hack private accounts and did disseminate that info to influence the election. But hey ... don't let the facts get in the way of shoving your head up your ass ... you're obviously intent on maintaining that position, so no amount of reality will dissuade you. Carry on spanky ... and keep spouting ignorance ... it only proves the point that idiots like you have no business second guessing the intel community. . That's the point dummy. "Intel agencies" is the punchline. God you're clueless. They all need to be fired. Morons like you believe their crap. People with brains don't. Have your brain tested |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 12:57:31 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... Says the idiot who can't even get a real job.
No you're just spouting nonsense ... your blabbering is nonsensical.
Go anklebite someone else, you freaking troll.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 13:13:36 GMT -5
Obviously the resident moron doesn't realize that the intel community didn't create the piss dossier on the Angry Cheeto ... or that there is a consensus among all the intel agencies that Russia did hack private accounts and did disseminate that info to influence the election. But hey ... don't let the facts get in the way of shoving your head up your ass ... you're obviously intent on maintaining that position, so no amount of reality will dissuade you. Carry on spanky ... and keep spouting ignorance ... it only proves the point that idiots like you have no business second guessing the intel community. . That's the point dummy. "Intel agencies" is the punchline. God you're clueless. They all need to be fired. Morons like you believe their crap. People with brains don't. Have your brain tested . "Intel community". LOL! |
|
|
|
Post by StalkingButler on Feb 13, 2017 13:16:53 GMT -5
This is the agency that accused the Ruskies of "hacking" with the election with absolutely zero evidence of same.
And yet you and the other deep state apologists accept what they're saying uncriticaly.
Let put this in perspective, a lot more Democrats believe that Trump was installed by the Russians than Republicans believe that Obama is a Muslim.
If the CIA employees can't or won't do their jobs they need to be fired. Period.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 13:20:48 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 13:58:40 GMT -5
This is the agency that accused the Ruskies of "hacking" with the election with absolutely zero evidence of same. And yet you and the other deep state apologists accept what they're saying uncriticaly. Let put this in perspective, a lot more Democrats believe that Trump was installed by the Russians than Republicans believe that Obama is a Muslim. If the CIA employees can't or won't do their jobs they need to be fired. Period. So let me get this straight ... because the intel community hasn't shared all their sources on the grounds that it would compromise those sources and methods ... then you will refuse to believe the consensus from the ALL heads of those agencies. WTF? That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. There's a freaking reason why they are referred to as 'spy' agencies, idiot ... they rely on secrecy of their actions else they wouldn't be able to carry out their mission. How the freak are they supposed to do their job and gain intel on our adversaries if you want them to disclose all their secrets and sources? You want them to do what you accused Clinton of doing ... disclose state secrets. You can't have it both ways dipstick ... you can't accuse Clinton of compromising nat'l security and then turn around insist that our intel agencies do the same just to satisfy your political itch. MORON !!! My gawd ... now you're just being purposely ignorant for no other reason than political ideology. The stupidest thing is that you have absolutely no evidence to challenge the conclusions of the intel agencies ... no facts or evidence to counter their assessments ... other than your ignorant ideology What possible motive could ALL the heads of these agencies have to put their professional reputations and the reputations of their agencies on the line with these reports? You're saying that this is a large scale conspiracy by the entire intel community ... and yet you have no evidence or even a motive to back it up. Well I guess I should take into account who's posting such ridiculous conspiracy theories ... one of the 'disgusting ilk' who cheers on wikileaks when they compromise the security of our spies and spec op soldiers around the world. Why do you have such a disregard for the security of the country and the safety of the people who put their lives on the line for their country ... is it real spite for the country or just jealously for the professionals in the field? |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 15:53:52 GMT -5
. Lol funny you are. And such a stupid hypocrite. "Ohhh we hate James Comey....love him....oh .....um hate him again". "Clapper, no evidence of Russian hacking".......ooops did I say that? Yes there is". AYFKM angryhead? The "intel community" us a freaking joke. So is anyone that believes a word they say (you). They are as politicized as the 9th district court, maybe worse. Fire them all and start over. Intelligence community.......LOL |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 16:00:19 GMT -5
. Lol funny you are. And such a stupid hypocrite. "Ohhh we hate James Comey....love him....oh .....um hate him again". "Clapper, no evidence of Russian hacking".......ooops did I say that? Yes there is". AYFKM angryhead? The "intel community" us a freaking joke. So is anyone that believes a word they say (you). They are as politicized as the 9th district court, maybe worse. Fire them all and start over. Intelligence community.......LOL Quite lying you F*cking piece of shit. I never said that and Clapper never said that. Now crawl back under your rock you freaking loser-who-can't-get-a-real-job. |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 16:18:26 GMT -5
. Lol funny you are. And such a stupid hypocrite. "Ohhh we hate James Comey....love him....oh .....um hate him again". "Clapper, no evidence of Russian hacking".......ooops did I say that? Yes there is". AYFKM angryhead? The "intel community" us a freaking joke. So is anyone that believes a word they say (you). They are as politicized as the 9th district court, maybe worse. Fire them all and start over. Intelligence community.......LOL Quite lying you F*cking piece of shit. I never said that and Clapper never said that. Now crawl back under your rock you freaking loser-who-can't-get-a-real-job. As Billy Madison says......"Oh really fool"
DNI Clapper: We ‘don’t have good insight’ into alleged Russian hacking
"As recently as Nov. 17, James Clapper, the nation’s top intelligence officer, told Congress his agencies “don’t have good insight” into a direct link between WikiLeaks and the emails supposedly hacked by a Russian operation from Democrats and the Hillary Clinton campaign."
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/10/james-clapper-we-dont-have-good-insight-potential-/
Don't have good insight. But angryman and the moonbats do. It fits the "why did Trump win" battle cry (and I do mean cry)
Bringing to light the FACT that you are BDC 's Village Idiot is becoming too easy.
"Intelligence community"
LOL!
Take a knee loser. They all desperately need to be fired. Corrupt FBI, corrupt CIA, corrupt (previous 2 of them) AG's......and you believe....ha-ha spanky.
" U.S. intelligence agencies, like so many other national institutions, have lost nearly all credibility in the eyes of the American public. The list is long, but includes economists, politicians, the mainstream media, central bankers, the financial system, and a lot more. The loss in credibility is well deserved and has nothing to do with Russia. Rather, it’s a function of a disastrous 21st century outcome for U.S. citizens both at home and abroad. A result that was achieved under eight years of Republican rule and then eight years of Democratic rule. The results were the same whether a donkey or elephant was in charge, because the people determining policy behind the scenes never really changed (same economists, central bankers, intelligence officials, etc), and the people selling the catastrophic policies to the public definitely never changes (mainstream media and its worthless pundits).
So here we stand at a moment where trust in essentially all U.S. institutions is at a well deserved all-time low, and the best the establishment can come up with is to blame Russia. Even worse, those pushing the whole “Putin is to blame for everything” conspiracy theories, consistently refuse to back up their assertions with any evidence whatsoever. In fact, with each passing week the case looks increasingly flimsy, with the latest declassified document issued Friday being particularly suspect. Even many of those largely convinced of Russia’s meddling in the U.S. election admit the most recent report was pathetic, embarrassing and proved absolutely nothing."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 16:34:27 GMT -5
Quite lying you F*cking piece of shit. I never said that and Clapper never said that. Now crawl back under your rock you freaking loser-who-can't-get-a-real-job. As Billy Madison says......"Oh really fool"
DNI Clapper: We ‘don’t have good insight’ into alleged Russian hacking
"As recently as Nov. 17, James Clapper, the nation’s top intelligence officer, told Congress his agencies “don’t have good insight” into a direct link between WikiLeaks and the emails supposedly hacked by a Russian operation from Democrats and the Hillary Clinton campaign."
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/10/james-clapper-we-dont-have-good-insight-potential-/
Don't have good insight. But angryman and the moonbats do. It fits the "why did Trump win" battle cry (and I do mean cry)
Bringing to light the FACT that you are BDC 's Village Idiot is becoming too easy.
"Intelligence community"
LOL!
Take a knee loser. They all desperately need to be fired. Corrupt FBI, corrupt CIA, corrupt (previous 2 of them) AG's......and you believe....ha-ha spanky.
Again with the freaking lies, you piece of shit. Read your own freaking sources IDIOT !!! No where does Clapper say "no evidence of Russian hacking". What he said is ... they can't prove that Russia gave the hacked emails directly to wikileaks ... which implies that Clapper knows Russia had possession of the hacked emails ... and the only way Russia could have the emails is if they did the hacking. “As far as the WikiLeaks connection, the evidence there is not as strong and we don’t have good insight into the sequencing of the releases or when the data may have been provided. We don’t have as good insight into that.”FROM YOUR ING SOURCE MORON !!! During the election, Mr. Clapper issued a statement on Oct. 7 saying the intelligence community is confident “that the Russian government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations.”
House Intelligence committee Chairman Devin Nunes, California Republican and a member of Trump’s transition team, said on Friday:
“Russia’s cyber-attacks are no surprise to the House Intelligence Committee, which has been closely monitoring Russia’s belligerence for years—as I’ve said many times, the Intelligence Community has repeatedly failed to anticipate Putin’s hostile actions.My gawd ... just STFU !!! Do you take the 'special' bus to school in the morning? Can you freaking read English? No wonder you can't get a real job ... you're a LYING MORON with reading comprehension problems !!! And quit posting the echo chamber bullshit that you constantly swallow ... no one cares about what your betters shove down your throat ... that's a personal matter between you and them ... |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 16:45:18 GMT -5
As Billy Madison says......"Oh really fool"
DNI Clapper: We ‘don’t have good insight’ into alleged Russian hacking
"As recently as Nov. 17, James Clapper, the nation’s top intelligence officer, told Congress his agencies “don’t have good insight” into a direct link between WikiLeaks and the emails supposedly hacked by a Russian operation from Democrats and the Hillary Clinton campaign."
www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/10/james-clapper-we-dont-have-good-insight-potential-/
Don't have good insight. But angryman and the moonbats do. It fits the "why did Trump win" battle cry (and I do mean cry)
Bringing to light the FACT that you are BDC 's Village Idiot is becoming too easy.
"Intelligence community"
LOL!
Take a knee loser. They all desperately need to be fired. Corrupt FBI, corrupt CIA, corrupt (previous 2 of them) AG's......and you believe....ha-ha spanky.
Again with the freaking lies, you piece of shit. Read your own freaking sources IDIOT !!! No where does Clapper say "no evidence of Russian hacking". What he said is ... they can't prove that Russia gave the hacked emails directly to wikileaks ... which implies that Clapper knows Russia had possession of the hacked emails ... and the only way Russia could have the emails is if they did the hacking. “As far as the WikiLeaks connection, the evidence there is not as strong and we don’t have good insight into the sequencing of the releases or when the data may have been provided. We don’t have as good insight into that.”FROM YOUR F*ckING SOURCE MORON !!! During the election, Mr. Clapper issued a statement on Oct. 7 saying the intelligence community is confident “that the Russian government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations.”
House Intelligence committee Chairman Devin Nunes, California Republican and a member of Trump’s transition team, said on Friday:
“Russia’s cyber-attacks are no surprise to the House Intelligence Committee, which has been closely monitoring Russia’s belligerence for years—as I’ve said many times, the Intelligence Community has repeatedly failed to anticipate Putin’s hostile actions.My gawd ... just STFU !!! Do you take the 'special' bus to school in the morning? Can you freaking read English? No wonder you can't get a real job ... you're a LYING MORON with reading comprehension problems !!! And quit posting the echo chamber bullshit that you constantly swallow ... no one cares about what your betters shove down your throat ... that's a personal matter between you and them ... You give Village Idiots a bad name. It's like you try to out-moron yourself.
" U.S. intelligence agencies, like so many other national institutions, have lost nearly all credibility in the eyes of the American public. The list is long, but includes economists, politicians, the mainstream media, central bankers, the financial system, and a lot more. The loss in credibility is well deserved and has nothing to do with Russia. Rather, it’s a function of a disastrous 21st century outcome for U.S. citizens both at home and abroad. A result that was achieved under eight years of Republican rule and then eight years of Democratic rule. The results were the same whether a donkey or elephant was in charge, because the people determining policy behind the scenes never really changed (same economists, central bankers, intelligence officials, etc), and the people selling the catastrophic policies to the public definitely never changes (mainstream media and its worthless pundits).
So here we stand at a moment where trust in essentially all U.S. institutions is at a well deserved all-time low, and the best the establishment can come up with is to blame Russia. Even worse, those pushing the whole “Putin is to blame for everything” conspiracy theories, consistently refuse to back up their assertions with any evidence whatsoever. In fact, with each passing week the case looks increasingly flimsy, with the latest declassified document issued Friday being particularly suspect. Even many of those largely convinced of Russia’s meddling in the U.S. election admit the most recent report was pathetic, embarrassing and proved absolutely nothing."
Take a knee, you're getting pummeled.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 16:50:17 GMT -5
Listen ... I've used your own source to prove what lying piece of shit you are ... and now you're posting unsourced echo chamber opinion bullshit because you're a F*cking coward running from your original post.
That is why you're a pissant and not worth any effort ... your own sources prove you're a lying idiot.
Now crawl back under your rock and put some ice on those welts.
Freaking Pissant Liar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 17:10:12 GMT -5
Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Friday declassified report on Russia's efforts to influence the outcome of the 2016 election as presented to the Senate Intelligence committee.
Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections“Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” is a declassified version of a highly
classified assessment that has been provided to the President and to recipients approved by the
President.
The Intelligence Community rarely can publicly reveal the full extent of its knowledge or the precise
bases for its assessments, as the release of such information would reveal sensitive sources or
methods and imperil the ability to collect critical foreign intelligence in the future.
Thus, while the conclusions in the report are all reflected in the classified assessment, the declassified
report does not and cannot include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence and
sources and methods.
Key Judgments
Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression
of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these
activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort
compared to previous operations.
We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US
presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.
We further assess
Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We
have high confidence in these judgments.
We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her
unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA, NSA and FBI have high confidence
in this judgment.
Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the
electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining
her future presidency.
Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior
since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and
goals.
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert
intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government
agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”
Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US
presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage
candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.
Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US
presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.
We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence
Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data obtained in
cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets and relayed material to
WikiLeaks.
Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local
electoral boards. DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or
compromised were not involved in vote tallying.
Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a
platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
We assess Moscow will apply lessons learned from its Putin-ordered campaign aimed at the US
presidential election to future influence efforts worldwide, including against US allies and their
election processes.
BOOM !!! |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 17:11:38 GMT -5
Listen ... I've used your own source to prove what lying piece of shit you are ... and now you're posting unsourced echo chamber opinion bullshit because you're a F*cking coward running from your original post. That is why you're a pissant and not worth any effort ... your own sources prove you're a lying idiot. Now crawl back under your rock and put some ice on those welts. Freaking Pissant Liar. . My source, you lying, retarded, drug addict, has Clapper in Late November(you know, after the election) saying the "intelligence" is questionable. You, stupid, used OCTOBER dates cited in the source. You're so quick to try and prove your stupidity you forget how to read. You neglect and disregard facts and reality. The "intelligence" is politicized, it's made up, there's not a reasonable person on earth that trusts it, and you are a freaking dope. Mama is home from the welfare office with your gubmint cheese, she's making you a sandwich. Make your way upstairs, put down the bong and have something to eat. K....spanky? |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 17:15:40 GMT -5
Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Friday declassified report on Russia's efforts to influence the outcome of the 2016 election as presented to the Senate Intelligence committee.
Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections“Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” is a declassified version of a highly
classified assessment that has been provided to the President and to recipients approved by the
President.
The Intelligence Community rarely can publicly reveal the full extent of its knowledge or the precise
bases for its assessments, as the release of such information would reveal sensitive sources or
methods and imperil the ability to collect critical foreign intelligence in the future.
Thus, while the conclusions in the report are all reflected in the classified assessment, the declassified
report does not and cannot include the full supporting information, including specific intelligence and
sources and methods.
Key Judgments
Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential election represent the most recent expression
of Moscow’s longstanding desire to undermine the US-led liberal democratic order, but these
activities demonstrated a significant escalation in directness, level of activity, and scope of effort
compared to previous operations.
We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US
presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process,
denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.
We further assess
Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump.
We
have high confidence in these judgments.
We also assess Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s
election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her
unfavorably to him. All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA, NSA and FBI have high confidence
in this judgment.
Moscow’s approach evolved over the course of the campaign based on Russia’s understanding of the
electoral prospects of the two main candidates. When it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election, the Russian influence campaign began to focus more on undermining
her future presidency.
Further information has come to light since Election Day that, when combined with Russian behavior
since early November 2016, increases our confidence in our assessments of Russian motivations and
goals.
Moscow’s influence campaign followed a Russian messaging strategy that blends covert
intelligence operations—such as cyber activity—with overt efforts by Russian Government
agencies, state-funded media, third-party intermediaries, and paid social media users or “trolls.”
Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has a history of conducting covert influence campaigns focused on US
presidential elections that have used intelligence officers and agents and press placements to disparage
candidates perceived as hostile to the Kremlin.
Russia’s intelligence services conducted cyber operations against targets associated with the 2016 US
presidential election, including targets associated with both major US political parties.
We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence
Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data obtained in
cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets and relayed material to
WikiLeaks.
Russian intelligence obtained and maintained access to elements of multiple US state or local
electoral boards. DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or
compromised were not involved in vote tallying.
Russia’s state-run propaganda machine contributed to the influence campaign by serving as a
platform for Kremlin messaging to Russian and international audiences.
We assess Moscow will apply lessons learned from its Putin-ordered campaign aimed at the US
presidential election to future influence efforts worldwide, including against US allies and their
election processes.
. Save face here once and admit your lie about Clapper........cmon spanky, you can do it |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 17:17:25 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... the pissant refuses to admit his own sources prove he's a lying piece of shit ... what a surprise.
Read the official report provided by the Director of National Intelligence ... you know, that guy Clapper ... where "All three agencies agree with this judgment. CIA, NSA and FBI" ... and published by the whacko wingnut Senate Intel committee.
Now STFU and run away you little PISSANT !!!
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 17:22:07 GMT -5
Heh, heh, heh ... the pissant refuses to admit his own sources prove he's a lying piece of shit ... what a surprise. Read the official report provided by the Director of National Intelligence ... you know, that guy Clapper ... and published by the whacko wingnut Senate. Now STFU you little PISSANT !!! . Heh heh the scumbag drug addict refuses to admit Nov 17 is after October. He continues to think the "evil Russians" ruined he and his mommies life by "inserting" Trump. Sad pathetic widdle spanky |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 17:27:31 GMT -5
Run away little pissant ... run away ... you've taken enough abuse ... from your own sources no less.
See ya later pissant ... come back anytime when you need to get your empty head slapped around with facts ... not that it does much good for a lying POS like you ... but the facts are facts regardless of what an imbecile you are.
And by-the-by pissant "the WikiLeaks connection" <> Russian hack ... no matter how much a moron like you tries to conflate the two.
|
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 18:03:43 GMT -5
Run away little pissant ... run away ... you've taken enough abuse ... from your own sources no less. See ya later pissant ... come back anytime when you need to get your empty head slapped around with facts ... not that it does much good for a lying POS like you ... but the facts are facts regardless of what an imbecile you are. And by-the-by pissant " the WikiLeaks connection" <> Russian hack ... no matter how much a moron like you tries to conflate the two. . You got spanked drug addict. As usual. Where did the "evil Russians" go? Oooops. Where is "intel community"?? Lol! You're a moron |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 18:05:35 GMT -5
You think there really is a question still that the Russians were not behind the hacking? Good grief. And as for the last Attorneys Generals. Please. Attorney General and the name Jess Sessions still does not go together. Much like the word President and Trump. After three weeks those two words still do not look right. I know it is a fact but... . Prove the hacking. Cmon prove it. Show where it got Trump elected? Another excuse in the long list of cry baby whining. |
|
|
|
Post by backinblack on Feb 13, 2017 18:26:10 GMT -5
You think there really is a question still that the Russians were not behind the hacking? Good grief. And as for the last Attorneys Generals. Please. Attorney General and the name Jess Sessions still does not go together. Much like the word President and Trump. After three weeks those two words still do not look right. I know it is a fact but... . Prove the hacking. Cmon prove it. Show where it got Trump elected? Another excuse in the long list of cry baby whining. . It's so cute you think the same "intelligence" that miraculously lost 55,000 emails, conveniently had an epiphany, and found Russian hacking just as Hellary lost. Where's the hacking for the last 8 years? Why now? You people are pathetic liars. Just stop |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 18:44:56 GMT -5
Thank gawd that the professional intel community takes their oath of office to heart and is maintaining our national security by keeping the Traitor-in-Chief from access to our most sensitive secrets. The clusterF*ck that is the Angry Cheeto is so not trusted that they give him a doodling book during the intel briefs. Here he is in a typical intel briefing ... Awwww ... he's looks sooo proud of himself..  |
|
